Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ryan v. Griffin, 62 N.W.2d 504.

69 citing documents.

  • Susan Neegard, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
    “[E]xcept where reasonable minds may not differ, what due care requires and whether it has been exercised is [a fact question] for the jury.” d 504, 507 (Minn. 1954).
  • Ednika Dabney, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    7 reasonable minds may not differ, what due care requires and whether it has been exercised is [a fact question] for the jury.” see also Brager v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Fargo, Inc., (“Where the roadway has been icy or wet and slippery, the question of negligence has been held to be for the jury.”).
  • Citizen's National Bank of Willmar v. Taylor 368 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1985
  • Citizen's National Bank of Willmar v. Taylor 368 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1985
    Anderson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 223 Minn. 1, 7 , overruled on other grounds, Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , Kernan v. St.
  • Nelson v. Nelson 166 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1969
  • Nelson v. Nelson 166 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1969
    The situation here is comparable to the credibility problem that arose in the case of Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 .
  • Roberts v. Kettner 161 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1968
  • Roberts v. Kettner 161 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1968
    This court stated that it had been held in a number of recent cases that rear-end accidents do not necessarily give rise to liability as a matter of law, citing Connaker v. Hart, 275 Minn. 289 , 146 N. W. (2d) 607 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Pluwak v. Lindberg, 268 Minn. 524 , 130 N. W. (2d) 134 ; and Whelan v. Gould, 259 Minn. 203 , 106 N. W. (2d) 893 .
  • Risacher v. Lien 155 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1967
  • Risacher v. Lien 155 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1967
    Pluwak v. Lindberg, 268 Minn. 524, 528 , 130 N. W. (2d) 134, 138 ; Shastid v. Shue, 247 Minn. 314, 322 , 77 N. W. (2d) 273, 279 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91, 94 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504, 507 ; Tibbetts v. Nyberg, 276 Minn. 431 , 150 N. W. (2d) 687 .
  • Reese v. Henke 152 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1967
  • Reese v. Henke 152 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1967
    Pluwak v. Lindberg, 268 Minn. 524, 528 , 130 N. W. (2d) 134, 138 ; Shastid v. Shue, 247 Minn. 314, 322 , 77 N. W. (2d) 273, 279 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91, 94 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504, 507 ; Tibbetts v. Nyberg, 276 Minn. 431 , 150 N. W. (2d) 687 .
  • Tibbetts v. Nyberg 150 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1967
  • Tibbetts v. Nyberg 150 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1967
    See, also, Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91, 94 , 62 *434 N. W. (2d) 504, 507; Pluwak v. Lindberg, 268 Minn. 524, 532 , 130 N. W. (2d) 134, 140 .
  • Wimperis v. Saltzinger 140 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1966
  • Wimperis v. Saltzinger 140 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1966
    Co. 244 Minn. 427 , 70 N. W. (2d) 358 ; Hardy v. Anderson, 241 Minn. 478 , 63 N. W. (2d) 814 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Nees v. Minneapolis St.
  • Pluwak v. Lindberg 130 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1964
  • Pluwak v. Lindberg 130 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1964
    In Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91, 94 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504, 507 , we said: “* * * There are reciprocal duties on the part of the driver of a leading automobile and the driver of the car following.
  • Barclay v. O'DELL 123 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1963
  • Barclay v. O'DELL 123 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1963
    7 Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91, 94 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504, 507 ; Kuether v. Locke, 261 Minn. 41, 47 , 110 N. W. (2d) 539, 544 .
  • Kellerman v. Nelson 122 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1963
  • Kellerman v. Nelson 122 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1963
    1 Fleenor v. Rowley, 198 Minn. 163 , ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Cooper v. Hoeglund, 221 Minn. 446 , 22 N. W. (2d) 450 ; Northern Liquid Gas Co. v. Hildreth (8 Cir.) 180 F. (2d) 330.
  • Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
  • Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
    See, Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91, 94 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504, 507 .
  • McKenzie v. Siegel 112 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1961
  • McKenzie v. Siegel 112 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1961
    Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91, 98 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504, 509 .
  • Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
  • Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
    Co. 218 Minn. 273, 282 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487, 493 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 .
  • Kuether v. Locke 110 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1961
  • Kuether v. Locke 110 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1961
    In Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91, 94 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504, 507 , Mr. Chief Justice Dell in an exhaustive opinion considered the reciprocal rights and duties of drivers of vehicles preceding and following one another.
  • Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
  • Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
    1 Ballweber v. Kleist, 248 Minn. 102 , 78 N. W. (2d) 671 ; Dahling v. Dammann, 251 Minn. 171 , 87 N. W. (2d) 25 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Jablinske v. Eckstrom, 247 Minn. 140 , 76 N. W. (2d) 654 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 .
  • Grant v. Malkerson Sales, Inc. 108 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1961
  • Grant v. Malkerson Sales, Inc. 108 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1961
    Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; Schneider v. The Texas Co. 244 Minn. 131 , 69 N. W. (2d) 329 .
  • Ondrachek v. Kettner 98 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1959
  • Ondrachek v. Kettner 98 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1959
    Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 .
  • Wilson v. Sorge 97 N.W.2d 477 Minn. 1959
  • Wilson v. Sorge 97 N.W.2d 477 Minn. 1959
    Conflicting evidence about the suddenness of the stops in Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 , and Fredhom v. Smith, 193 Minn. 569 , , was for the jury.
  • Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
  • Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
    11 Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Jablinske v. Eckstrom, 247 Minn. 140 , 76 N. W. (2d) 654 ; Johnson v. Mancilman, 241 Minn. 461 , 63 N. W. (2d) 569 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 .
  • Minder v. Peterson 93 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1958
  • Minder v. Peterson 93 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1958
    As was said in Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91, 98 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 , 509: “* * * It is not for the trial court to accept a- part of the testimony of a witness and reject the remainder.
  • Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
  • Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
    P. & P. R. Co. 239 Minn. 530 , 60 N. W. (2d) 49 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260.
  • Bush v. Havir 91 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1958
  • Jeske v. George R. Wolff Holding Co. 83 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1957
  • Jeske v. George R. Wolff Holding Co. 83 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1957
    Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Sankiewicz v. Speckel, 209 Minn. 528 , .
  • Bridges v. Hillman 82 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1957
  • Bridges v. Hillman 82 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1957
    Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Rintala v. Duluth, W. & P. Ry.
  • Lee v. Lee 80 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1957