DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brannan v. Shertzer, 64 N.W.2d 755.

34 citing documents.

  • Herbert B. Fick v. Eric J. Edwardson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    “There is no fixed standard by which loss for injuries can be determined.” Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 287, d 755, 761 (1954).
  • Raze v. Mueller 587 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1999
  • Raze v. Mueller 587 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1999
    See also Walser v. Vinge, 275 Minn. 230, 235 , (concluding that a jury must take into consideration all of the elements of damage which the plaintiff proved); Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 283-84 , -60 (1954) (determining that the plaintiff did not prove substantial general damages because "her symptoms and ailments antedated the accident and were in no way related to it.”).
  • Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
  • Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
    10 See, e. g., Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , Stacy v. Goff, 241 Minn. 301
  • Kinning v. Sutton 220 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 1974
  • Kinning v. Sutton 220 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 1974
    Krueger v. Knutson, 261 Minn. 144 , Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277
  • Gibson v. Sandstrom 216 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1974
  • Gibson v. Sandstrom 216 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1974
    Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277
  • Bastianson v. Forschen 196 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1972
  • Bastianson v. Forschen 196 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1972
    1 Dale v. Pushor, 246 Minn. 254 , Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , Anderson v. Minneapolis, St.
  • Jacoboski v. Prax 187 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1971
  • Jacoboski v. Prax 187 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1971
    Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; Bryant v. N. P. Ry.
  • Weiss v. Great Northern Railway Company 176 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1970
  • Weiss v. Great Northern Railway Company 176 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1970
    Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; Gardner v. Germain, 264 Minn. 61 , 117 N. W. (2d) 759 ; Bryant v. N. P. Ry.
  • Vanderlinde v. Wehle 144 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1966
  • Vanderlinde v. Wehle 144 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1966
    Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; Hallada v. G. N. Ry.
  • Backman v. Fitch 137 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1965
  • Backman v. Fitch 137 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1965
    Mr. Justice Knutson, speaking for this court in Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 287 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755, 761 , said: “* * * A verdict cannot be set aside simply because this court may be of the opinion that it was not adequate.
  • Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
  • Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
    This court in Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 287 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755, 761 , said: “* * * A verdict cannot be set aside simply because this court may be of the opinion that it was not adequate.
  • Webster v. Schwartz 81 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1957
  • Webster v. Schwartz 81 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1957
    3 *230 However, in Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 281 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755, 757 , in considering Rule 15.01, we stated: “Rule 15.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a party, after a responsive pleading has been served, may amend his pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party.
  • Genzel v. Halvorson 80 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1957
  • Genzel v. Halvorson 80 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1957
    Berg v. Ullevig, 244 Minn. 390 , 70 N. W. (2d) 133 ; Greenberg v. Holfeltz, 244 Minn. 175 , 69 N. W. (2d) 369 ; Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 .
  • Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. Pushor 75 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1956
  • Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. Pushor 75 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1956
    7 The footnotes referred to in the above quotation are as follows: “8 Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; 1 Youngquist & Blacik, Minnesota Rules Practice, p. 476.
  • Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
  • Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
    Colstad v. Levine, 248 Minn. 279 , 67 N. W. (2d) 648 ; Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; see, Wright, Minnesota Rules, p. 101.
  • Berg v. Ullevig 70 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1955
  • Berg v. Ullevig 70 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1955
    This court in the recent case of Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 287 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755, 761 , in discussing the inadequacy or the excessiveness of verdicts, said: “* * * ^ verdict cannot be set aside simply because this court may be of the opinion that it was not adequate.
  • Colstad v. Levine 67 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1954
  • Colstad v. Levine 67 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1954
    8 Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; 1 Yonngquist & Blacik, Minnesota Rules Practice, p. 476.
  • Meemken v. O'HARA 66 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1954