Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Molto v. Molto, 64 N.W.2d 154.

34 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: Q. S. M. and T. R. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The natural rights of the parents should be carefully safeguarded but not at the expense of their children.” (); (citing this aspect of Booth in a child-in-need-of-protection-or- services appeal); In re P.T.
In Re the Custody of N.M.O. 399 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Custody of N.M.O. 399 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See also Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , (court awarded aunt and uncle custody upon finding the child’s welfare would be best served by such placement); State ex rel.
In Re Welfare of Larson 251 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 1977
In Re Welfare of Larson 251 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 1977
In Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112, 114 , this court stated: "* * * [T]he trial court is vested with broad discretionary powers and in the absence of a showing of arbitrary action in awarding custody of a child, this court will not interfere.
Erickson v. Erickson 220 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1974
Erickson v. Erickson 220 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1974
Fish v. Fish, supra; Schultz v. Schultz, supra; Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 [1954].” The primary question before us, therefore, is whether the trial court abused its discretion.
LaBelle v. LaBelle 207 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1973
LaBelle v. LaBelle 207 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1973
Hanson v. Hanson, supra; Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112
Wallin v. Wallin 187 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1971
Wallin v. Wallin 187 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1971
Smith v. Smith, 282 Minn. 190 , 163 N. W. (2d) 852 ; Schultz v. Schultz, supra; Fish v. Fish, supra; Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 .
In Re Viray 172 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1969
In Re Viray 172 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1969
This court said in Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112, 114 , , 156: "* * * The natural rights of the parents should be carefully safeguarded but not at the expense of their children.
Hanson v. Hanson 170 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1969
Vandewege v. Vandewege 170 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1969
Hanson v. Hanson 170 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1969
Fish v. Fish, supra, Schultz v. Schultz, supra; Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 .
Vandewege v. Vandewege 170 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1969
Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 ; Bennett v. Bennett, 277 Minn. 227, 229 , 152 N. W. (2d) 187, 189 ; Lindberg v. Lindberg, 282 Minn. 536 , 163 N. W. (2d) 870 .
Hansen v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1969
Hansen v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1969
Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , 123 N. W. (2d) 118 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 .
In Re O'Neil 453 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Schultz v. Schultz 123 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1963
Schultz v. Schultz 123 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1963
Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, 261 Minn. 272 , 111 N. W. (2d) 782 .
Village of Edina v. Joseph 119 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1962
Village of Edina v. Joseph 119 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1962
Section 607.01 states in part: *103 “In all cases the prevailing party shall be allowed his disbursements necessarily paid or incurred.” It has been held that “[t]he language of this statute plainly gives this court no discretion in the allowance, disallowance, or apportionment of disbursements necessarily paid or incurred.” Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112, 118 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154, 158 , citing Collins v. Collins, 221 Minn. 343 , 22 N. W. (2d) 168 , 23 N. W. (2d) 9 ; Krusemark v. Krusemark, 232 Mi
Eisel v. Eisel 110 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1961
Eisel v. Eisel 110 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1961
The court’s memorandum points out that under our decisions the moral fitness of the mother is not necessarily controlling, citing Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 .
In Re Booth 253 Minn. 395 Minn. 1958
In Re Booth 253 Minn. 395 Minn. 1958
[4] In Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112, 114 , 64 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Whaley 75 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1956
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Whaley 75 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1956
Rys v. Vorlicek, 229 Minn. 497 , 40 N. W. (2d) 350 ; In re Guardianship of Maloney, 234 Minn. 1 , 48 N. W. (2d) 313 , 49 N. W. (2d) 576 ; Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 .
Stoll v. Stoll 68 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1955
Stoll v. Stoll 68 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1955
Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 .
Jones v. Jones 64 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1954
Jones v. Jones 64 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1954
See, Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154 .