Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad, 68 N.W.2d 873.

58 citing documents.

Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marie R.R., 244 Minn. 1, 29-30 , overruled on other grounds by Busch, d at 396-97 .
Olsen v. Special School Dist. No. 1 427 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Olsen v. Special School Dist. No. 1 427 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marie Railroad, 244 Minn. 1 , (cost of daily health attendant care was discounted); Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc., (injured parties’ future medical expenses were discounted to present value by jury).
Kleeman v. Cadwell 414 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kleeman v. Cadwell 414 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marie Railroad Co., 244 Minn. 1, 29-30
Johnson v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marie Railroad Co., 244 Minn. 1 , 29 & n. 23, , 891 & n. 23 (1955).
Bianchi v. Nordby 409 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1987
Clark v. Johnson Bros. Construction 370 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Clark v. Johnson Bros. Construction 370 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marie Railroad Company, 244 Minn. 1
Ahrenholz v. Hennepin County 295 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1980
Ahrenholz v. Hennepin County 295 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1980
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Marie R. Co., 244 Minn. 1, 29 , 60 Mich.L.Rev.
Steinhaus v. Adamson 228 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1975
Steinhaus v. Adamson 228 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1975
Marie R. Co. 244 Minn. 1
Stenzel v. Bach 203 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1973
Stenzel v. Bach 203 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1973
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1
Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 ; Flaherty v. Minneapolis & St.
Schmidt v. Beninga 173 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1970
Schmidt v. Beninga 173 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1970
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1, 9 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873, 879 .
Mandelbaum v. Knutson 462 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Lommen v. Adolphson & Peterson Construction Co. 168 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1969
Lommen v. Adolphson & Peterson Construction Co. 168 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1969
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 .
Larsen v. Minneapolis Gas Company 163 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1968
Larsen v. Minneapolis Gas Company 163 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1968
Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 , where verdicts were reduced by this court because mathematical formulae had been misapplied by the jury.
Sorenson v. Cargill, Inc. 163 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1968
Sorenson v. Cargill, Inc. 163 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1968
Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 ; and Thill v. Modern Erecting Co. 272 Minn. 217 , 136 N. W. (2d) 677 .
Sandvik v. Jammes 160 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1968
Sandvik v. Jammes 160 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1968
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 .
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 136 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1965
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 136 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1965
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 ; Hallada v. G. N. Ry.
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co. 129 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1964
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co. 129 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1964
Marie R. Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 , and need not be recited at length.
McCormick v. Malecha 122 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1963
McCormick v. Malecha 122 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1963
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1, 27 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873, 889 , we said that “by lack of a definite standard we do not forfeit our recourse to common sense and social practicality in given cases” and that judicial care must be exercised to prevent an unreasonable financial burden to be shifted out of sympathy for the plaintiff.
Kirkwood v. Sikorski 115 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1962
Kirkwood v. Sikorski 115 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1962
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 ; Nepstad v. Lambert, 235 Minn. 1 , 50 N. W. (2d) 614 .
Gordon v. Land of Lakes Motor Co. 113 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1962
Gordon v. Land of Lakes Motor Co. 113 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1962
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1, 27 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 , 889: «* * * by iack of a definite standard we do not forfeit our recourse to common sense and social practicality in given cases.” We are of the view that a new trial on the issue of damages should be granted unless plaintiff, within 5 days after the filing of this opinion, shall file in this
McCrank v. Great Northern Railway Co. 109 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1961
McCrank v. Great Northern Railway Co. 109 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1961
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 .
Dawald v. Rocket Transfer Co. 109 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1961
Dawald v. Rocket Transfer Co. 109 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1961
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 .
Romano v. Dibbs 98 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1959
Romano v. Dibbs 98 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1959
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1, 27 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873, 889 , we said: “* * * by lack of a definite standard we do not forfeit our recourse to common sense and social practicality in given cases.
Wilson v. Sorge 97 N.W.2d 477 Minn. 1959
Wilson v. Sorge 97 N.W.2d 477 Minn. 1959
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1, 27 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873, 889 , for instance, we held that an ordinary laborer was not required to introduce proof of specific pecuniary loss in order to- recover for impairment of his earning capacity.