Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Schifsky, 69 N.W.2d 89.

53 citing documents.

State v. Currie 143 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1966
She offered to prove by this testimony that the account owner had told the defendant that he would go “to the County Attorney and tell him the truth in the matter.” Defendant argued that this testimony should have been admitted to prove consent to the purchase and that it was admissible under the rule of State v. Schifsky, 243 Minn. 533 , 69 N. W. (2d) 89 , to prove the effect of the statement upon the intent of the defendant.
State v. Robinson 123 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1963
State v. Robinson 123 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1963
See, State v. Schifsky, 243 Minn. 533 , 69 N. W. (2d) 89 .