Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Butler v. Engel, 68 N.W.2d 226.

30 citing documents.

State v. Loge 608 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2000
State v. Loge 608 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2000
§ 169.14 (1998) (speeding); Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317, 336
Bills v. Willow Run I Apartments 534 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Bills v. Willow Run I Apartments 534 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317, 322
Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks 536 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1995
Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks 536 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1995
Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317, 322
Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks 515 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks 515 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317, 322
Stenvik v. Constant 502 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Stenvik v. Constant 502 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317, 322
State v. Miller 395 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Miller 395 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317, 336
Duck Ex Rel. Duck v. Modern Roadways, Inc. 253 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1977
Duck Ex Rel. Duck v. Modern Roadways, Inc. 253 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1977
Thole v. Noorlun, 287 Minn. 52 , Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317
Eklund v. Lund 222 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1974
Eklund v. Lund 222 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1974
See, also, Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317
Thole v. Noorlun 177 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1970
Thole v. Noorlun 177 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1970
Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317 , 68 N. W. (2d) 226 .
Leiknes v. Witte 107 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1961
Leiknes v. Witte 107 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1961
The trial judge granted the motion on the ground that omission of this instruction was a fundamental and basic error of law which compelled him to grant a new trial, basing his decision on Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317 , 68 N. W. (2d) 226 .
Walker v. Ruvelson 102 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1960
Walker v. Ruvelson 102 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1960
Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317 , 68 N. W. (2d) 226 .
Wolle v. Jorgenson 99 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1959
Wolle v. Jorgenson 99 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1959
Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317 , 68 N. W. (2d) 226 , related to erroneous instructions as to' lawful and unlawful rates of speed within a municipality.
Anderson v. Mid-Motors, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1959
Anderson v. Mid-Motors, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1959
This appears to be the reasoning in Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317, 340 , 68 N. W. (2d) 226, 240 , where the court stated: “* * * where it is determined that the speed of a defendant is unlawful, he forfeits whatever right of way he may have had, and the adverse party is entitled to instructions to that effect.” (Italics supplied.)
Smith v. Hubbard 91 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1958
Smith v. Hubbard 91 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1958
See, Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317 , 68 N. W. (2d) 226 .
Lynghaug v. Payte 76 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1956
Lynghaug v. Payte 76 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1956
See, Butler v. Engel, 243 Minn. 317 , 68 N. W. (2d) 226 .