Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northern National Bank v. Northern Minnesota National Bank, 70 N.W.2d 118.

29 citing documents.

DAMHOF Dairy, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Am., N. Nat’l Bank of Bemidji v. N. Minn. Nat’l Bank of Duluth, (“As a general rule, strangers to a contract acquire no rights under such a contract.
Drummer Development, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Minn. Nat’l Bank of Duluth , 244 Minn. 202, 208, d 5 118, 123 (1955).
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Generally, one who is not a party to a contract has no rights under the contract, but a third party “may enforce a promise made for his benefit even though he is a stranger both to the contract and the consideration.” N. Natl Bank of Bemidji v. N. Minn. Nat’l Bank of Duluth, 244 Minn. 202, 208-09
Hickman v. SAFECO Insurance Co. of America 695 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 2005
Hickman v. SAFECO Insurance Co. of America 695 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 2005
N. Nat’l Bank of Bemidji v. N. Minn. Nat’l Bank of Duluth, 244 Minn. 202, 208
Mon-Ray, Inc. v. Granite Re, Inc. 677 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Mon-Ray, Inc. v. Granite Re, Inc. 677 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See N. Nat'l Bank of Bemidji v. N. Minn. Nat’l Bank of Duluth, 244 Minn. 202, 208 , (holding that the general rule that nonparties to a contract acquire no rights under it is subject to exception of third-party beneficiary contracts).
Veerkamp v. Farmers Cooperative Creamery of Foreston, Minnesota 573 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Veerkamp v. Farmers Cooperative Creamery of Foreston, Minnesota 573 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Northern Nat’l Bank of Bemidji v. Northern Minn. Nat’l Bank of Duluth, 244 Minn. 202, 208 , (stranger to contract has no rights under contract); Anderson v. First Northtoum Nat’l Bank, (same); (valid contract requires meeting of parties’ minds regardin
Dufresne v. American National Bank & Trust Co. 374 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dufresne v. American National Bank & Trust Co. 374 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Northern National Bank of Bemidji v. Northern Minnesota National Bank of Duluth, 244 Minn. 202 , Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328
Anderson v. First Northtown National Bank 361 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Anderson v. First Northtown National Bank 361 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Northern National Bank v. Northern Minnesota National Bank, 244 Minn. 202, 208
Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1984
Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1984
In Northern National Bank v. Northern Minnesota National Bank, 244 Minn. 202, 209 , we defined, in die- *139 turn, a donee beneficiary as “one to whom the promisee intends to make a gift.” In Buchman, supra, we observed in a footnote that the then tentative draft of the second edition of the Restatement of Contracts proposed to substitute the term “intended” benefici
Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the U. of M. 215 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1974
Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the U. of M. 215 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1974
Bank, 244 Minn. 202 , La Mourea v. Rhude, 209 Minn. 53 , 17A C. J. S., Contracts, § 519(3).
HEALY PLUMB. & HEAT. CO. v. Mpls.-St. Paul San. Dist. 169 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1969
Healy Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District 169 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1969
HEALY PLUMB. & HEAT. CO. v. Mpls.-St. Paul San. Dist. 169 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1969
Bank, 244 Minn. 202 , , do not involve the liability of the surety on a bond required by § 574.26.
Healy Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District 169 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1969
Bank, 244 Minn. 202 , 70 N. W. (2d) *13 118 , do not involve the liability of the surety on a bond required by § 574.26.
Hedberg & Sons Co. v. NEW AMSTERDAM CAS. CO. OF NY 144 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1966
Hedberg & Sons Co. v. NEW AMSTERDAM CAS. CO. OF NY 144 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1966
Bank, 244 Minn. 202 , 70 N. W. (2d) 118 ; Segal v. Bloom Brothers Co. 249 Minn. 367 , 82 N. W. (2d) 359 ; 17 Am.
Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co. 89 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1958
Long v. Campion 84 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1957
Long v. Campion 84 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1957
Bank, 244 Minn. 202 , 70 N. W. (2d) 118 .
Crow & Crow, Inc. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. 77 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1956
Crow & Crow, Inc. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. 77 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1956
Bank, 244 Minn. 202 , 70 N. W. (2d) 118 , the court stated that it could not agree with the plaintiff that it was such a third-party creditor beneficiary, thus dismissing the action on the ground that the plaintiff had no claim against the defendant St.