Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad, 66 N.W.2d 763.
-
State v. EAH
75 N.W.2d 195
Minn. 1956
Co. 243 Minn. 58, 70 , 66 N.W.
-
State v. E. A. H.
75 N.W.2d 195
Minn. 1956
Johnson v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. 243 Minn. 58, 70 , 66 N. W. (2d) 763, 771 .
- State Ex Rel. Foster v. Naftalin 74 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 1956
- Millen v. Great Northern Railway Co. 66 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1954
-
Millen v. Great Northern Railway Co.
66 N.W.2d 777
Minn. 1954
It is our opinion that our decision filed this date in Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co. 243 Minn. 58 , 66 N. W. (2d) 763 , is determinative of the legal issues raised in this case.