Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hallada v. Great Northern Railway, 69 N.W.2d 673.

54 citing documents.

George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
224 (1894) (“There is high authority for the proposition that courts can take judicial notice of the Carlisle Tables, and can use them in estimating the probable length of life, whether they were introduced in evidence or not.”); Tollefson v. Ehlers, 252 Minn. 370, 377 , (accepting the American Experience Tables of Mortality); Hallada v. Great N. Ry., 244 Minn. 81, 95 , -85 (1955) (accepting the U.S. Life Experience Table of Mortality), overruled on other grounds by Busch v. Busch Const., Inc.,
Roers v. Engebretson 479 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Roers v. Engebretson 479 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., 244 Minn. 81, 95 , overruled on other grounds, Busch v. Busch Constr., Inc.
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 416 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1987
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 416 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1987
§ 604.07 (1986), enacted subsequent to the trial of this matter, or the standard of reasonableness laid down in Hallada v. Great Northern Ry., 244 Minn. 81, 99 , : Whatever process is adopted in fixing an injured person’s damages, the reasonableness of the lump sum awarded by the jury must, in the last analysis, also be tested from the unitary standpoint of what total financial benefits that lump sum will confer upon the injured person as a means
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 399 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 399 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Appellants cite Hallada v. Great Northern Railway, 244 Minn. 81 , for the proposition that when a plaintiff could live off the investment return for his expected life span without touching the principal, a new trial is justified.
Lamke v. Louden 269 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1978
Lamke v. Louden 269 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1978
Co., 244 Minn. 81 , a case which we expressly overruled in Busch v. General Motors Corp., Minn.
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Co., 244 Minn. 81 , and its progeny.
Fifer v. Nelson 204 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1973
Fifer v. Nelson 204 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1973
Bastianson v. Forschen 202 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1972
Bastianson v. Forschen 202 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1972
Jangula v. Klocek 170 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1969
Jangula v. Klocek 170 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1969
Co. 244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 ; Marlowe v. Gunderson, 260 Minn. 115 , 109 N. W. (2d) 323 .
Larsen v. Minneapolis Gas Company 163 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1968
Larsen v. Minneapolis Gas Company 163 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1968
Co. 244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 ; and Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St.
Sorenson v. Cargill, Inc. 163 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1968
Sorenson v. Cargill, Inc. 163 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1968
Co. 244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 ; McCrank v. G. N. Ry.
Integrity Mut. Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 160 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1968
Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 160 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1968
Integrity Mut. Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 160 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1968
Co., 244 Minn. 81 , ; Employers Lia.
Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 160 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1968
Co. 244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 ; Employers Lia.
State v. Larsen 145 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1966
State v. Larsen 145 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1966
Co. 244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 ; Halos v. Nachbar, 196 Minn. 387 , ; 2B Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure (Rules ed.) § 1054, p. 338; Wright, Minnesota Rules, Supp. p. 60; Note, 37 Iowa L. Rev. 95 .
Vanderlinde v. Wehle 144 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1966
Vanderlinde v. Wehle 144 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1966
Co. 244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 , opinion followed in Id.
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 136 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1965
Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 136 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1965
Co. 244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 .
Gardner v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc. 127 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1964
Gardner v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc. 127 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1964
244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 .
State v. Casey 115 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 1962
State v. Casey 115 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 1962
244 Minn. 81, 92 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673, 683 , where we stated: “Although evidence in mitigation of damages is generally admissible in a personal injury suit, no arbitrary rule of evidence can be formulated which is applicable to all situations and much must be left to the sound discretion of the trial court.” 4 In Plummer v. Mold, 2
McCrank v. Great Northern Railway Co. 109 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1961
McCrank v. Great Northern Railway Co. 109 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1961
244 Minn. 81, 95 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673, 685 , wherein this court, in reviewing the verdict and granting a new trial unless plaintiff consented to a reduction from $170,154.80 to $105,000, stated: “* * * Life expectancy and earning expectancy are not synonymous since a person may live longer than he is capable of pursuing gainful emp
Meagher v. Kavli 97 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1959
Meagher v. Kavli 97 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1959
244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 ; Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 .
State v. LaBarre 96 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1959
State v. LaBarre 96 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1959
244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 ; Id.
Person v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 89 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1958
Person v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 89 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1958
244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 .
Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 ; Beebe v. Kleidon, 242 Minn. 521 , 65 N. W. (2d) 614 .
Cox v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. 84 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1957
Cox v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. 84 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1957
244 Minn. 81 , 94 to 100, 69 N. W. (2d) 673 , 684 to 688, and no useful purpose would be served in reiterating them here.
Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 .