Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Mullen, 68 N.W.2d 640.

51 citing documents.

Roger Dean Olson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Petition of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Lake George Park, d at 465; d 640, 647 (Minn. 1955) (“It is not always necessary that the existence of all these essentials be present.”); Romanchuk, d at 426 (“[The factors] are neither ironclad nor inflexible and yield to manifestation of contrary intention.”).
Magnuson v. Cossette 707 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Magnuson v. Cossette 707 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
See Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31, 40
Lake George Park, L.L.C. v. IBM Mid-America Employees Federal Credit Union 576 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Lake George Park, L.L.C. v. IBM Mid-America Employees Federal Credit Union 576 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31, 40
Niehaus v. City of Litchfield 529 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Niehaus v. City of Litchfield 529 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31, 39-41 , -47 (1955).
Bode v. Bode 494 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Bode v. Bode 494 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Recently in dicta, this court has used the terms "easements by necessity” interchangeably with "easements by implication.” with Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31, 40-41
Nunnelee v. Schuna 431 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Nunnelee v. Schuna 431 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31, 41
Clark v. Galaxy Apartments 427 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Clark v. Galaxy Apartments 427 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31, 40
Rosendahl v. Nelson 408 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rosendahl v. Nelson 408 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31, 40
Kleis v. Johnson 354 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kleis v. Johnson 354 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31, 41
Minnesota Power & Light Company v. Carlton County 145 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1980
Minnesota Power & Light Company v. Carlton County 145 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1980
See, Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , , and cases cited.
LeNeau v. Nessett 194 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1972
LeNeau v. Nessett 194 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1972
In Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31, 41 , we stated that “[w]hether an easement may be created by implication must be determined as of the time of severance.” Defendants here owned both the dominant and servient tracts of land in 1966 when they sold lots 9 to 12 to plaintiffs.
Bloomer v. Bloomer 185 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1971
Bloomer v. Bloomer 185 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1971
No. 1, 248 Minn. 212 , 79 N. W. (2d) 428 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; 1 C. J. S., Accord and Satisfaction, §§ 48a, 48c, and 49b; 1 Am.
Hartman v. Blanding's Inc. 181 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1970
Hartman v. Blanding's Inc. 181 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1970
Heise v. The J. R. Clark Co. 245 Minn. 179 , 71 N. W. (2d) 818 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , .
Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Carlton County 145 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1966
Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Carlton County 145 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1966
See, Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 , and cases cited.
In Re Estate of Baumgartner 144 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1966
In Re Estate of Baumgartner 144 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1966
Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Hickman v. Sutherland, 222 Minn. 161 , 23 N. W. (2d) 593 ; In re Estate of Fitzgerald, 205 Minn. 57 , .
Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
No. 1, 248 Minn. 212 , 79 N. W. (2d) 428 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176.
Mayers v. Michael 124 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1963
Mayers v. Michael 124 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1963
Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 .
Liebsch v. Abbott 122 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1963
Liebsch v. Abbott 122 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1963
Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. *457 135, 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , .
Barrett v. MacDonald 121 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1963
Werner v. Sample 107 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1961
Werner v. Sample 107 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1961
servitude on one tenement in favor of another, which at the time of severance of title is in use and is reasonably necessary for the fair enjoyment of the tenement to which such use is beneficial, then, upon a severance of ownership, a grant of the dominant tenement includes by implication the right to continue such use.” The rule was thoroughly discussed and authorities cited in Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 , and we see no reason to cover the same ground again.
G. C. Kohlmier, Inc. v. Albin 101 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1960
G. C. Kohlmier, Inc. v. Albin 101 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1960
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , ; Hoverson v. Hoverson, 216 Minn. 237 , 12 N. W. (2d) 497 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , ; Hoverson v. Hoverson, 216 Minn. 237 , 12 N. W. (2d) 497 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
No. 1, 248 Minn. 212 , 79 N. W. (2d) 428 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Holt v. Swenson 90 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1958
Holt v. Swenson 90 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1958
1 Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Heise v. the JR Clark Co. 71 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1955
LeMay v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 71 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1955
LeMay v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 71 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1955
See, also, Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 .