Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 69 N.W.2d 667.

99 citing documents.

In the Matter of the John P. Weitzel and Mary M. Weitzel 2007 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Terese M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sysdyne Corporation v. Brian Rousslang 860 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 2015
Sysdyne Corporation v. Brian Rousslang 860 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 2015
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 295
Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc. 844 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 2014
Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc. 844 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 2014
See Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 292 , ("Recovery may be had for inducing breach of contract.”).
Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester 690 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2005
Harbor Broadcasting, Inc. v. Boundary Waters Broadcasters, Inc. 636 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Harbor Broadcasting, Inc. v. Boundary Waters Broadcasters, Inc. 636 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(quoting Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290 , ).
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 633 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 633 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 292
Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 616 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2000
Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 616 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2000
P. 12.02(e); see also Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290
Manson v. State, Department of Employee Relations 613 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Manson v. State, Department of Employee Relations 613 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Safety, (quoting Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290 , (emphasis in Elzie )).
Doyle v. Kuch 611 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Doyle v. Kuch 611 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290
Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 572 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 572 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
On appeal from a judgment of dismissal for failure to state a claim, we should consider “whether the complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” (quoting Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290 , .
Barton v. Moore 558 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1997
Barton v. Moore 558 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1997
Safety, (citing Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290 , ).
R.A., Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 556 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
R.A., Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 556 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Ass’n, (citing Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 292 , ).
614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 547 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 547 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Safety, (quoting Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290 , ).
Lipka v. MINN. SCHOOL EMPLOY. ASS'N. 537 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288 , 292, , 671 (1955); review denied (Minn. Feb.
Lipka v. Minnesota School Employees Ass'n, Local 1980 537 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288 , 292, , 671 (1955); review denied (Minn. Feb.
State Bank of Young America v. Fabel 530 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State Bank of Young America v. Fabel 530 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Safety, (quoting Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290 , (emphasis in original)).
Kedzior v. NORWEST BANK MINN., NAT. ASS'N 527 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Safety, (quoting Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288 , 290, , 670 (1955)).
In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 517 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 517 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Safety, (quoting Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290 , ).
Kjesbo v. Ricks 517 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1994
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288 , 295, , 673 (1955).
Kjesbo v. Ricks 506 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Kjesbo v. Ricks 506 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(quoting Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288 , 291 n. 5, , 671 n. 4 (1955)).
Gertken v. State 493 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Gertken v. State 493 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 292
Ludowese v. Redmann 479 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Ludowese v. Redmann 479 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 292
Schumacher v. Ihrke 469 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Schumacher v. Ihrke 469 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 292
Carlson v. Estes 458 N.W.2d 123 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Carlson v. Estes 458 N.W.2d 123 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Royal Realty Co. v. Leven, 244 Minn. 288, 290
Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Commission 428 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Commission 428 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288
Community Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Kemper 426 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Community Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Kemper 426 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288
Aslakson v. Home Savings Ass'n 416 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Aslakson v. Home Savings Ass'n 416 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
distinguishes interference with contract from inducing breach of contract: “Interference with contract” is somewhat broader than “inducing breach of contract” in that the former includes “ ‘any act injuring or destroying persons or property which retards, makes more difficult, or prevents performance, or makes performance of a contract of less value to the promisee.’ ” Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288 , 291 n. 5, , 671 n. 4 (1955).
Searles v. Searles 412 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Searles v. Searles 412 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
It is immaterial to our consideration here whether or not the plaintiff can prove the facts alleged.” Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 290 , (emphasis supplied).