Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kedrowski v. Czech, 69 N.W.2d 337.

32 citing documents.

Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co. 658 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 2003
Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co. 658 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 2003
§ 169.96(b) (2002) (providing that violation of a traffic statute is prima facie evidence of negligence, not negligence per se); Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. Ill, 118, (noting that “the mere fact that [the plaintiff] may have been under the influence of alcohol did not in and of itself constitute contributory negligence”); (Minn.App.
O'Neal v. Burlington Northern, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
O'Neal v. Burlington Northern, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111 , Olstad v. Fahse, 204 Minn. 118 , 282 N.W.
Hille v. County of Wright 400 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hille v. County of Wright 400 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111, 118
Sauter v. Wasemiller 364 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sauter v. Wasemiller 364 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, e.g., Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111
State v. Frank 364 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1985
State v. Frank 364 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1985
Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111 , Olstad v. Fahse, 204 Minn. 118 , 282 N.W.
Wright v. M. B. Hagen Realty Co. 269 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1978
Wright v. M. B. Hagen Realty Co. 269 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1978
State, by Lord v. Bradac, 257 Minn. 467 , ; Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. Ill, ; Nelson v. Swedish Hospital, 241 Minn. 551 , ; Phelan v. Carey, 222 Minn. 1 , .” 287 Minn. 404 , .
State v. Hawkins 260 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1977
State v. Hawkins 260 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1977
694, 696 (1938): “ * * * That a witness at the time of the occurrences which he relates was under the influence of liquor is competent to show the impairment of his powers of observation and the likelihood of impaired recollection.” Accord, Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111 , 3A Wigmore, Evidence (Chadbourn rev.) § 933; 81 Am.
Kilty v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company 178 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1970
Kilty v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company 178 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1970
State, by Lord, v. Bradac, 257 Minn. 467 , 102 N. W. (2d) 34 ; Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111 , 69 N. W. (2d) 337 ; Nelson v. Swedish Hospital, 241 Minn. 551 , 64 N. W. (2d) 38 ; Phelan v. Carey, 222 Minn. 1 , 23 N. W. (2d) 10 .
Kramer v. Kramer 162 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1968
Kramer v. Kramer 162 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1968
Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111, 126 , 69 N. W. *66 (2d) 337, 346.
Larson v. Montpetit 147 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
Larson v. Montpetit 147 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
Dahling v. Dammann, 251 Minn. 171 , 87 N. W. (2d) 25 ; Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111 , 69 N. W. (2d) *399 337; cf. Ondrachek v. Kettner, 256 Minn. 297 , 98 N. W. (2d) 91 .
Nelson v. Tripp 118 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1962
Nelson v. Tripp 118 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1962
See, Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111 , 69 N. W. (2d) 337 ; Taylor v. Northern States Power Co. 196 Minn. 22 , 264 N. W. *220 139 ; Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, 241 Minn. 46 , 62 N. W. (2d) 354 .
Newcomb v. Meiss 116 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1962
Newcomb v. Meiss 116 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1962
Rosin v. International Harvester Co. 262 Minn. 445 , 115 N. W. (2d) 50 ; Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111 , 69 N. W. (2d) 337 .
State, by Lord v. Bradac 102 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1960
State, by Lord v. Bradac 102 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1960
Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111 , 69 N. W. (2d) 337 .
Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111 , 69 N. W. (2d) 337 ; Mechler v. McMahon, 180 Minn. 252 , .
DeLOSIER v. Metcalf 80 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1956
DeLOSIER v. Metcalf 80 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1956
4 See, e. g., Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111 , 69 N. W. (2d) 337 .
Sims v. Hallett Construction Co. 77 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1956
Sims v. Hallett Construction Co. 77 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1956
Eestatement, Torts, §§ 440, 441, 447; Medved v. Doolittle, supra; Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. supra; Kedrowski v. Czech, 244 Minn. 111 , 69 N. W. (2d) 337 .