DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 69 N.W.2d 636.

59 citing documents.

  • Dennis Sershen, Minn. 2022
    (“[U]ntil the time comes when medical knowledge has progressed to such a point that experts in the field of medicine can agree, causal relation in determining compensable injury or disease will have 11 to remain in the province of the trier of fact.”).
  • Felton v. Anton Chevrolet 513 N.W.2d 457 Minn. 1994
  • Felton v. Anton Chevrolet 513 N.W.2d 457 Minn. 1994
    “Until the time comes when medical knowledge has progressed to such a point that experts in the field of medicine can agree, causal relation in determining com-pensable injury or disease will have to remain in the province of the trier of fact.” quoting Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304-05
  • Ruether v. State 455 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1990
  • Ruether v. State 455 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1990
    As we said in Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304-05 , : [UJntil the time comes when medical knowledge has progressed to such a point that experts in the field of medicine can agree, causal relation in determining compensable injury or disease will have to remain in the province of the trier of fact.
  • Worden v. County of Houston 356 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1984
  • Worden v. County of Houston 356 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1984
    Fryhling v. Acrometal Products, Inc., Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304
  • Hough v. Drevdahl & Son Co., Inc. 281 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1979
  • Hough v. Drevdahl & Son Co., Inc. 281 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1979
    Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc., 282 Minn. 322 , Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301
  • Fryhling v. Acrometal Products, Inc. 269 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1978
  • Fryhling v. Acrometal Products, Inc. 269 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1978
    As stated in Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304 , : “ * * * [U]ntil the time comes when medical knowledge has progressed to such a point that experts in the field of medicine can agree, causal relation in determining compensable injury or disease will have to remain in the province of the trier of fact.
  • Wever v. Farmhand, Inc. 243 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1976
  • Wever v. Farmhand, Inc. 243 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1976
    In Stibbs v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 277 Minn. 248, 252 , we discussed the requisite relationship between work activity and death by heart attack as follows: “* * * While it is no longer necessary to show' that the exertion must be something extraordinary, or an accident, Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 , it must be shown that the death from a heart attack is due to the work that was being done and that the employment was a contributing factor in bringing about the
  • Kelly v. C.M.I. Refrigeration Co. 231 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1975
  • Kelly v. C.M.I. Refrigeration Co. 231 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1975
    In Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304 , we made the following observation: “* * * [U]ntil the time comes when medical knowledge has progressed to such a point that experts in the field of medicine can agree, causal relation in determining compensable injury or disease will have to remain in the province of the trier of fa
  • Lind v. City of Rochester 195 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1972
  • Lind v. City of Rochester 195 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1972
    In Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304 , we said: «* * * [U]ntil the time comes when medical knowledge has progressed to such a point that experts in the field of medicine can agree, causal relation in determining compensable injury or disease will have to remain in the province of the trier of fact.” Conflicting testimony
  • Reierson v. Land O' Lakes Creameries, Inc. 177 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1970
  • Reierson v. Land O' Lakes Creameries, Inc. 177 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1970
    Martin v. Swift & Co. 269 Minn. 217 , 130 N. W. (2d) 522 ; Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 ; and Hiber v. City of St.
  • Grabowski v. Great Northern Oil Company 167 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1969
  • Grabowski v. Great Northern Oil Company 167 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1969
    Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc. supra; Peterson v. The Ruberoid Co. 261 Minn. 497 , 113 N. W. (2d) 85 ; Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 .
  • Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1969
  • Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1969
    The determination of whether the employment was a causal factor in producing the attack must necessarily rest upon competent medical testimony, and, where there is a conflict, the finding of the commission will not be disturbed on appeal.” The same rule is stated in Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636, 639 , also involving a coronary thrombosis.
  • Prax v. Standard Construction Co. 158 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1968
  • Prax v. Standard Construction Co. 158 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 1968
    Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304, note 5 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636, 639, note 4 ; Peterson v. The Ruberoid Co. 261 Minn. 497, 499 , 113 N. W. (2d) 85, 86 ; Kolflat v. Northern Ordnance Co. 274 Minn. 104, 107 , 142 N. W. (2d) 588, 590 .
  • Stibbs v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 152 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1967
  • Stibbs v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 152 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1967
    While it is no longer necessary to show that the exertion must be something extraordinary, or an accident, Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 , it must be shown that the death from a heart attack is due to the work that was being done and that the employment was a contributing factor in bringing about the death.
  • Hickory v. Hickory Insulation Co. 134 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1965
  • Hickory v. Hickory Insulation Co. 134 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1965
    We must be controlled by the views expressed on this subject in Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 , and Christenson v. Pedersen Brothers, 269 Minn. 111 , 130 N. W. (2d) 234 , where we held that the findings of the commission must be sustained.
  • Christenson v. Pedersen Brothers 130 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1964
  • Christenson v. Pedersen Brothers 130 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1964
    “In Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636, 639 , where we had occasion to discuss this problem, we said: “ * * It would be of no value to set forth the opposing views of the medical experts.
  • Roman v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 129 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1964
  • Roman v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 129 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1964
    pensation Law, § 39.10, the author, in discussing gradual-injury decisions, says: “* * * [Mjost jurisdictions have at some time awarded compensation for conditions that have developed, not instantaneously, but gradually over periods ranging from a few hours to several decades, cul *381 minating in disability from * * * back injury, * * * herniated disc and the like.” In Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636, 639 , where medical experts took opposite positions with res
  • Haskin v. County of Hennepin 127 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1964
  • Haskin v. County of Hennepin 127 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1964
    In Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636, 639 , we said: “* * * [U]ntil the time comes when medical knowledge has progressed to such a point that experts in the field of medicine can agree, causal relation in determining compensable injury or disease will have to remain in the province of the trier of fact.
  • Daly v. Bergstedt 126 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1964
  • Daly v. Bergstedt 126 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1964
    The question raised by appellants was considered in Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636, 639 , where it was claimed that a trauma or exertion could not result in thrombosis.
  • Schwartz v. City of Duluth 119 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1963
  • Schwartz v. City of Duluth 119 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1963
    No. 102, 251 Minn. 297 , 87 N. W. (2d) 646 ; Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 ; Niess v. Superior Packing Co. 249 Minn. 263 , 81 N. W. (2d) 773 ; Anderson v. Armour & Co. 257 Minn. 281 , 101 N. W. (2d) 435 .
  • Yureko v. Prospect Foundry Co. 115 N.W.2d 477 Minn. 1962
  • Yureko v. Prospect Foundry Co. 115 N.W.2d 477 Minn. 1962
    Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 .
  • Peterson v. the Ruberoid Co. 113 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1962
  • Peterson v. the Ruberoid Co. 113 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1962
    6 Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 ; 1 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 12.20, p. 174.
  • Gillette v. Harold, Inc. 101 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1960
  • Gillette v. Harold, Inc. 101 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1960
    Creamery Assn. 248 Minn. 20 , 78 N. W. [2d] 430); and innumerable phases of heart difficulties, the most recent of which is Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 .
  • First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. McLean 93 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1958
  • First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. McLean 93 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1958
    Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 .
  • Rosvold v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 102 87 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1958
  • Rosvold v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 102 87 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1958
    In Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301, 304 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636, 639 , where we had occasion to discuss this problem, we said: “* * * It would be of no value to set forth the opposing views of the medical experts.
  • Niess v. Superior Packing Co. 81 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1957