Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Smith v. Illinois Central Railroad, 68 N.W.2d 638.

28 citing documents.

Fiduciary Foundation, LLC v. Brown 834 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Fiduciary Foundation, LLC v. Brown 834 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
STATE, BY POLLUTION CONTROL AGCY. v. US Steel 240 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1976
STATE, BY POLLUTION CONTROL AGCY. v. US Steel 240 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1976
R. Co. 244 Minn. 52 , (holding nonappealable an order refusing to vacate a nonappealable order).
Appeal of O'Rourke 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
Stolp v. Scrimshaw 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
Appeal of O'Rourke 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
In Smith v. Illinois Central R. Co., 244 Minn. 52, 54, 55 , 640 (1955), wherein an appeal from district court was dismissed on the ground that, under the provisions of Minn.St.
Stolp v. Scrimshaw 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
In Smith v. Illinois Central R. Co. 244 Minn. 52, 54, 55 , 640 (1955), wherein an appeal from district court was dismissed on the ground that, under the provisions of Minn. St.
Cohen v. Globe Business Sales, Inc. 166 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1969
Cohen v. Globe Business Sales, Inc. 166 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1969
R. Co. 244 Minn. 52 , 68 N. W. (2d) 638 , there is no right to appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order granting summary judgment.
Merten v. DeZurik 165 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1969
Merten v. DeZurik 165 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1969
R. Co. 244 Minn. 52 , 68 N. W. (2d) 638 .
LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of Minneapolis 162 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1968
LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of Minneapolis 162 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1968
R. Co. 244 Minn. 52 , 68 N. W. (2d) 638 , an order denying a motion to vacate the order granting summary judgment is also not appealable.
Ginsberg v. Williams 135 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1965
Eisenberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 134 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1965
Ginsberg v. Williams 135 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1965
R. Co. 244 Minn. 52 , 68 N. W. (2d) 638 , where we rejected arguments that limiting appeals of right by statute was violative of our constitutional provisions pertaining to the division of powers (Minn. Const, art. 3, § 1) and to the appellate jurisdiction of this court (art. 6, § 2).
Eisenberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 134 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1965
R. Co. 244 Minn. 52 , 68 N. W. (2d) 638 ; Luethi v. Stanko, 240 Minn. 380 , 61 N. W. (2d) 522 .
Blomberg v. Tschida 130 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1964
Blomberg v. Tschida 130 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1964
R. Co. 244 Minn. 52 , 68 N. W. (2d) 638 ; Cunningham, Appealable Orders in Minnesota, 37 Minn. L. Rev. 309 , 343.
Anderson v. Gabrielson 126 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1964
Anderson v. Gabrielson 126 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1964
R. Co. 244 Minn. 52 , 68 N. W. (2d) 638 ; Satter v. Turner, 257 Minn. 145, 157 , 100 N. W. (2d) 660, 668 .
Koenigs v. Werner 116 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1962
Koenigs v. Werner 116 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1962
McMillen v. Meyer, 246 Minn. 132, 136 , 74 N. W. (2d) 393, 396 ; Weatherhead v. Burau, 237 Minn. 325, 327 , 54 N. W. (2d) 570, 571 ; Satter v. Turner, 257 Minn. 145 , 100 N. W. (2d) 660 ; Laramie Motors, Inc. v. Larson, 253 Minn. 484 , 92 N. W. (2d) 803 ; Anderson v. Jennie, 248 Minn. 369 , 80 N. W. (2d) 41 ; Smith v. Illinois Central R. Co. 244 Minn. 52 , 68 N. W. (2d) 638 ; Von Bank v. Mayer, 239 Minn. 492 , 59 N. W. (2d) 307 ; Voller v. Schmitz, 236 Minn. 155 , 52 N. W. (2d) 289 ; Kelsey v. C
Satter v. Turner 100 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1960
Satter v. Turner 100 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1960
R. Co. 244 Minn. 52 , 68 N. W. (2d) 638 , we held that an order granting a new trial on that ground was clearly not appealable.
Laramie Motors, Inc. v. Larson 92 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1958
Laramie Motors, Inc. v. Larson 92 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1958
R. Co. 244 Minn. 52 , 68 N. W. (2d) 638 ; Von Bank v. Mayer, 239 Minn. 492 , 59 N. W. (2d) 307 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.