DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gifford v. Vore, 72 N.W.2d 625.

41 citing documents.

  • In re the Matter of the Application of Mekonnen Tulu and Tadelech N. Guda to Register the Title … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    A district court’s findings in a boundary line dispute “will not be reversed on appeal unless they are manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.”
  • Lyle Batton, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    This court will not disturb the district court’ s findings regarding practical location unless they are 9 “manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.”
  • Richard S. Anderson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    An appealing party who lost property by practical location must “show that there is no substantial evidence reasonably tending to sustain the [district] court’s findings.” Gifford v. Vore , 245 Minn. 432, 434
  • In the Matter of the Application of Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • In the Matter of the Application of Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    “Upon appeal the burden is on the appellant to show that there is no substantial evidence reasonably tending to sustain the [district] courts findings.” Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432, 434
  • Britney v. Swan Lake Cabin Corp. 795 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
  • Britney v. Swan Lake Cabin Corp. 795 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
    A district court’s findings of fact in a boundary-line dispute “will not be reversed on appeal unless they are manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.” Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432, 434
  • Pratt Investment Co. v. Kennedy 636 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Pratt Investment Co. v. Kennedy 636 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432, 436
  • Petition of McGinnis 536 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Petition of McGinnis 536 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    at 516 , d at 215 (quoting Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432, 436 , ).
  • Matter of Zahradka 472 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • Matter of Zahradka 472 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    at 516 , d at 215 (citing Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432, 436 , ).
  • Patterson v. Stover 400 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Patterson v. Stover 400 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432, 434
  • Nash v. Mahan 377 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Nash v. Mahan 377 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432, 434
  • Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
  • Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
    9 Sherin v. Brackett, 36 Minn. 152, 154 , ; Dean v. Goddard, supra; Village of Newport v. Taylor, 225 Minn. 299 , 30 N. W. (2d) 588 ; Johnson v. Raddohl, 226 Minn. 343 , 32 N. W. (2d) 860 ; Fishman v. Nielsen, 237 Minn. 1 , 53 N. W. (2d) 553 ; Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N. W. (2d) 625 .
  • Phillips v. Blowers 161 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 1968
  • Phillips v. Blowers 161 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 1968
    In Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N.W.
  • Moore v. Henricksen 165 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1968
  • Moore v. Henricksen 165 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1968
    have been expressly agreed upon between the parties claiming the land on both sides thereof and afterward acquiesced in; or (3) the parties whose rights are to be barred must have silently looked on, with knowledge of the true line, while the other party encroached upon it or subjected himself to expense in regard to the land which he would not have had the line been in dispute.” Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432, 436 , 72 N. W. (2d) 625, 628 .
  • Humenik v. Siwek 124 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1963
  • Humenik v. Siwek 124 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1963
    Delyea v. Turner, 264 Minn. 169 , 118 N. W. (2d) 436 ; Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N. W. (2d) 625 .
  • Aldrich v. Wilson 120 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1963
  • Aldrich v. Wilson 120 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1963
    Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N. W. (2d) 625 ; Fishman v. Nielsen, 237 Minn. 1 , 53 N. W. (2d) 553 ; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Selnes, 223 Minn. 518 , 27 N. W. (2d) 553 ; Dittrich v. Ubl, 216 Minn. 396 , 13 N. W. *161 (2d) 384; Dunkel v. Roth, 211 Minn. 194 , ; Liederbach v. Pickett, 199 Minn. 554 , ; Beardsley v. C
  • Delyea v. Turner 118 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1962
  • Delyea v. Turner 118 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1962
    Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N. W. (2d) 625 ; In re Estate of Dahl, 249 Minn. 156 , 81 N. W. (2d) 701 ; Hynan v. First Trust Co. 258 Minn. 118 , 103 N. W. (2d) 209 ; Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824 .
  • Neill v. Hake 93 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1958
  • Neill v. Hake 93 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1958
    Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N. W. (2d) 625 ; Fishman v. Nielsen, 237 Minn. 1 , 53 N. W. (2d) 553 ; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Selnes, 223 Minn. 518 , 27 N. W. (2d) 553 ; Dittrich v. Ubl, 216 Minn. 396 , 13 N. W. (2d) 384 ; Dunkel v. Roth, 211 Minn. 194 , ; Liederbach v. Pickett, 199 Minn. 554 , ; Beardsley v. Crane
  • State v. Gardin 86 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1957
  • State v. Gardin 86 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1957
    Werner v. Miller, 248 Minn. 75 , 78 N. W. (2d) 63 ; Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N. W. (2d) 625 .
  • State v. Maxwell 81 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1957
  • State v. Maxwell 81 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1957
    Werner v. Miller, 248 Minn. 75 , 78 N. W. (2d) 63 ; Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N. W. (2d) 625 ; In re Estate of Palmer, 238 Minn. 549 , 57 N. W. (2d) 409 .
  • Iverson v. Johnson 81 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1957
  • In Re Estate of Dahl 249 Minn. 156 Minn. 1957
  • In Re Estate of Dahl 249 Minn. 156 Minn. 1957
    Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N.W.
  • Iverson v. Johnson 81 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1957
    Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N. W. (2d) 625 .
  • Werner v. Miller 78 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1956
  • Werner v. Miller 78 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1956
    Williams v. Jayne, 210 Minn. 594 , ; Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N. W. (2d) 625 .