Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gartner v. Gartner, 74 N.W.2d 809.

29 citing documents.

Minn. 2022
in which we require a higher standard include oral modifications of written contracts (where oral terms might contradict or modify the written terms), reformation of written contracts due to mutual mistake (where oral testimony contradicts the plain terms of the contract to show it was not the parties’ true intent), d 809, 812 (Minn. 1956); and oral contracts to make a will when a party seeks specific performance (where only one party is available to testify as to the terms of the contract), n.1
Christie v. Estate 911 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 2018
Christie v. Estate 911 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 2018
In addition, specific performance of an oral contract to make a will requires "clear, positive, and convincing evidence," Clark v. Clark , , 8 n.10 (Minn. 1979), and "reformation of a written contract on the ground of mutual mistake" also requires "clear, unequivocal, and convincing" evidence, Gartner v. Gartner , 246 Minn. 319 , , 812 (1956).
In Re the Estate of Kinney 733 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 2007
In Re the Estate of Kinney 733 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 2007
6 Under common law, we analyze antenuptial agreements to determine whether they are “equitably and fairly made.” See Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319, 323 , -13 (1956).
Manderfeld v. Krovitz 539 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Manderfeld v. Krovitz 539 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Theisen’s, Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 309 Minn. 60 , Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319, 321
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 444 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1989
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 444 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1989
See, Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319, 343 , In re Malechow’s Estate, 143 Minn. 53, 57 , 172 N.W.
Estate of Serbus v. Serbus 324 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1982
Estate of Serbus v. Serbus 324 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1982
Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319, 323 , Slingerland v. Slingerland, 115 Minn. 270 , 132 N.W.
State Bank & Trust Co. v. Melzark 305 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1981
Matter of Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust, Etc. 305 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1981
Matter of Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust, Etc. 305 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1981
See Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319 , Minn. *764 Stat. § 519.11 (1980).
Theisen’s Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 243 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 1976
Theisen’s Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 243 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 1976
Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319 , Golden Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Super Valu Realty, supra.
Metro Office Parks Co. v. Control Data Corp. 205 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1973
Metro Office Parks Co. v. Control Data Corp. 205 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1973
Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319 , 74 N. W. (2d) 809 [1956] .
Naugle-Leck, Inc. v. Bursch 202 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1972
Naugle-Leck, Inc. v. Bursch 202 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1972
Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319 , 74 N. W. (2d) 809 [1956].
In Re Estate of Jeurissen 161 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1968
Jeurissen v. Ohnsorg 161 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1968
In Re Estate of Jeurissen 161 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1968
The applicable rules of law were set out most recently in Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319, 323 , , where this court said: "* * * Antenuptial contracts in anticipation of marriage, fixing the rights which the survivor shall have in the property of the other after his or her death, are not against public policy but are regarded with favor as conducive to the welfare of the parties making t
Jeurissen v. Ohnsorg 161 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1968
The applicable rules of law were set out most recently in Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319, 323 , 74 N. W. (2d) 809, 812 , where this court said: “* * * Antenuptial contracts in anticipation of marriage, fixing the rights which the survivor shall have in the property of the other after his or her death, are not against public policy but are regarded with favor as conducive to the welfare of the parties maki
Gabrelcik v. National Indemnity Co. 131 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1964
Golden Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Super Valu Realty, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1959
Golden Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Super Valu Realty, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1959
Gartner v. Gart-ner, 246 Minn. 319 , 74 N. W. (2d) 809 .
Hentges v. Schuttler 77 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1956
Hentges v. Schuttler 77 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1956
Bank v. Schroder, 175 Minn. 341 , ; Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319 , 74 N. W. (2d) 809 ; 8 Dunnell, Dig.