DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Genzel v. Halvorson, 80 N.W.2d 854.

26 citing documents.

  • State v. Brown 932 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 2019
  • State v. Brown 932 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 2019
    (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)), overruled in part on other grounds by Genzel v. Halvorson , 248 Minn. 527 , , 858-59 (1957).
  • Haile v. Sutherland 598 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • Haile v. Sutherland 598 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    12, 15 (1905) (concluding physician committed battery by operating on patient’s left ear rather than right ear), overruled in part by Genzel v. Halvorson, 248 Minn. 527, 533
  • Surf and Sand, Inc. v. Gardebring 457 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • Surf and Sand, Inc. v. Gardebring 457 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    961 (1916); Genzel v. Halvorson, 248 Minn. 527, 531 , -56 (1957).
  • Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1989
  • Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1989
    Our holding in Genzel v. Halvorson, 248 Minn. 527, 534 , that the trial court was within its constitutional power in raising the amount of damages was conditioned on the consent of the defendant.
  • Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc. 420 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc. 420 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    Genzel v. Halvorson, 248 Minn. 527, 533-34 , -59 (1957).
  • Kleeman v. Cadwell 414 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Kleeman v. Cadwell 414 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See Genzel v. Halvorson, 248 Minn. 527, 530 , (quoting Dimick v. Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474, 492 , 55 S.Ct.
  • Sonenstahl v. L.E.L.S., Inc. 372 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Sonenstahl v. L.E.L.S., Inc. 372 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Cornfeldt v. Tongen 262 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1977
  • Cornfeldt v. Tongen 262 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1977
    12 (1905), overruled on other grounds; Bang v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, 251 Minn. 427 , Genzel v. Halvorson, 248 Minn. 527
  • Walser v. Vinge 146 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
  • Walser v. Vinge 146 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
    This court in Genzel v. Halvorson, 248 Minn. 527 , 80 N. W. (2d) 854 , approved the use of an additur in the trial court’s discretion and expressed the view that there may be circumstances when that practice is in the interest of the sound administration of justice and avoids the necessity of a new trial with its accompanying expense and delay.
  • State, by Mondale v. Mecklenburg 140 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1966
  • State, by Mondale v. Mecklenburg 140 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1966
    See Genzel v. Halvorson, 248 Minn. 527 , 80 N. W. (2d) 854 , wherein this court held that additur, the practice of the court to condition a denial of a new trial on the defendant’s consent to an increase in the judgment, is within the constitutional power of the court.
  • Dziuk v. Loehrer 123 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 1963
  • Dziuk v. Loehrer 123 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 1963
    4 See, Seydel v. Reuber, 254 Minn. 168 , 94 N. W. (2d) 265 ; Genzel v. Halvorson, 248 Minn. 527 , 80 N. W. (2d) 854 ; Olson v. Christiansen, 230 Minn. 198 , 41 N. W. (2d) 248 .
  • Nelson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 108 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1961
  • Nelson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 108 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1961
    In Genzel v. Halvorson, 248 Minn. 527, 531 , 80 N. W. (2d) 854, 858 , we said: “* -i= * One procedure, the entry of judgment non obstante veredicto, has been declared unconstitutional under Amend.
  • Seydel v. Reuber 94 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1959
  • Seydel v. Reuber 94 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1959
    Genzel v. Halvorson, 248 Minn. 527 , 80 N. W. (2d) 854 .