Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kopio's, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc., 79 N.W.2d 921.

29 citing documents.

Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., … 875 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2016
Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 570 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1997
Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 570 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1997
Kopio’s, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc., 248 Minn. 348, 353
Lyman Lumber Co. v. Favorite Construction Co. 524 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Lyman Lumber Co. v. Favorite Construction Co. 524 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Kopio’s, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, 248 Minn. 348, 354 , (citing 16 Fletcher Cyclopedia Corporations (perm, ed.) section 8146, for the rule, “[w]here a corporation may be sued after its dissolution, process may ordinarily be served upon the same persons or officers who could have been properly served if the corporation had not been dissolved
Oak Ridge Care Center, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 460 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1990
Oak Ridge Care Center, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 460 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1990
Because of the improper dissolution, these corporations continue to exist as legal entities subject to the administrative rate determination process, Kopio’s, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc., 248 Minn. 348, 349-50 , and summary judgment in favor of the department with regard to its entitlement to pursue administrative remedies was appropriate.
Oak Ridge Care Center, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 452 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Oak Ridge Care Center, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 452 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
§ 300.59 (1982) provides that a corporation continues for three years after termination “for the purpose of prosecuting and defending actions, closing its affairs, disposing of its property, and dividing its capital, but for no other purpose.” In Kopio’s, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc., 248 Minn. 348 , the court held that this statute is applicable to corporations whose existence terminates by reason of voluntary dissolution pursuant to chapter 301.
Winkel v. Eden Rehabilitation Treatment Facility, Inc. 433 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Winkel v. Eden Rehabilitation Treatment Facility, Inc. 433 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In order for one to be an agent expressly or impliedly authorized to receive service under Rule 4.03(c), “it is first necessary that there be an actual agency relationship.” Kopios, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc., 248 Minn. 348, 354 , d *138 921, 925 (1956) (emphasis in original); Vasek v. Warren Grain & Seed Co.
Benchmark Computer Systems, Inc. v. London 417 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Benchmark Computer Systems, Inc. v. London 417 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kopio’s, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc., 248 Minn. 348, 355
Erickson v. Coast Catamaran Corp. 414 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1987
Erickson v. Coast Catamaran Corp. 414 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1987
Kopio’s, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, 248 Minn. 348, 355 , Derrick v. The Drolson Co., 244 Minn. 144, 150-51
Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London 385 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London 385 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Henderson v. Northwestern Heating Engineers, 274 Minn. 396 , Kopio’s v. Bridgeman Creameries, 248 Minn. 348
Vasek v. Warren Grain & Seed Co. 353 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Vasek v. Warren Grain & Seed Co. 353 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In order for one to be an “ ‘agent authorized expressly or impliedly’ to receive service, it is first necessary that there be an actual agency relationship.” Kopio’s, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc., 248 Minn. 348, 354 , (emphasis in original).
Wood v. Martin 328 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1983
Warembourg v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1982
Warembourg v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1982
Defendant’s attempts to analogize the instant matter with the facts presented in Henderson v. Northwestern Heating Engineers, Inc., 274 Minn. 396 , and Kopio’s, Inc., v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc., 248 Minn. 348 , each dealing with voluntarily dissolved domestic corporations, are inappropriate.
Duncan Elec. Co., Inc. v. Trans Data, Inc. 325 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1982
Duncan Elec. Co., Inc. v. Trans Data, Inc. 325 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1982
Kopio’s, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc., 248 Minn. 348
Neis v. Heinsohn/Phoenix, Inc. 628 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Mississippi Valley Development Corp. v. Colonial Enterprises, Inc. 217 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1974
Mississippi Valley Development Corp. v. Colonial Enterprises, Inc. 217 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1974
Kopio’s, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc. 248 Minn. 348
Henderson v. Northwestern Heating Engineers, Inc. 144 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1966
Henderson v. Northwestern Heating Engineers, Inc. 144 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1966
“The order or certificate of dissolution shall be filed for record with the secretary of state and thereupon the corporate existence shall terminate.” In Kopio’s, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc. 248 Minn. 348, 350 , 79 N. W. (2d) 921, 923 , this court held: “* * * M. S. A. 301.56 provides that corporate existence‘shall terminate’ upon the filing of the certificate of dissolution with the secretary of state.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by