Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Radosevich, 82 N.W.2d 70.

25 citing documents.

State v. Ali 806 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 2011
City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
249 Minn. 268, 271 , (“[i]t is elementary that the right of appeal under our condemnation proceedings is governed by statute and that, unless the conditions prescribed by statute are observed, the court acquires no jurisdiction”); (“failure to compl
Woodhall v. State 738 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2007
Woodhall v. State 738 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2007
See, e.g., State v. Radosevich, 249 Minn. 268, 271 , (“[UJnless the conditions prescribed by [the condemnation appeal] statute are observed, the court acquires no jurisdiction.”).
HOUSING AND REDEVEL. AUTH. v. Adelmann 590 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1999
HOUSING AND REDEVEL. AUTH. v. Adelmann 590 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1999
State v. Goins, 286 Minn. 54, 57 , (citing State v. Radosevich, 249 Minn. 268 , ).
Judd v. State Ex Rel. Humprey 488 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Judd v. State Ex Rel. Humprey 488 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Id., d at 276 -77 (quoting State v. Radosevich, 249 Minn. 268, 275 , ).
County of Hennepin v. Holt 207 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1973
County of Hennepin v. Holt 207 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1973
State, by Ervin, v. May, 204 Minn. 564 , State, by Lord, v. Radosevich, 249 Minn. 268
Northern States Power Co. v. Schulze 204 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1973
Northern States Power Co. v. Schulze 204 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1973
The notice shall specify the particular award or failure to award appealed from, the nature and amount of his claim, the land to which it relates, and the grounds of his appeal.” The petitioner cites State, by Lord, v. Radosevich, 249 Minn. 268 , for the proposition that compliance with the appeal statute is jurisdictional.
County of Ramsey v. Ball 190 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1971
County of Ramsey v. Ball 190 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1971
State, by Lord, v. Radosevich, 249 Minn. 268 , 82 N. W. (2d) 70 .
State v. Goins 174 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1970
State v. Goins 174 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1970
State, by Lord, v. Radosevich, 249 Minn. 268 , 82 N. W. (2d) 70 .
City of Austin v. Wright 114 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1962
City of Austin v. Wright 114 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1962
*309 In the more recent case of State, by Lord, v. Radosevich, 249 Minn. 268, 271 , 82 N. W. (2d) 70, 72 , following the Klein and Boucher cases, this court stated: “It is elementary that the right of appeal under our condemnation proceedings is governed by statute and that, unless the conditions prescribed by statute are observed, the court acquires no jurisdiction.
State, by Lord v. Frisby 108 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1961
State, by Lord v. Frisby 108 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1961
In State, by Lord, v. Radosevich, 249 Minn. 268, 275 , 82 N. W. (2d) 70, 74 , we suggested that, where there are conflicting claims of ownership, special interrogatories might be used “in determining a division of such amount among the respective interests of the claimants.” In like manner, it would seem that the danger of double recovery could be avoided by requir
State v. Jude 102 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1960
State v. Jude 102 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1960
Every owner is constitutionally entitled to a just and equal application of the rule that what he owns shall not be taken from him or destroyed or damaged for public use without just compensation.” *45 An application of this principle is found in State, by Lord, v. Radosevich, 249 Minn. 268 , 82 N. W. (2d) 70 .
State v. Rust 98 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1959
State v. Rust 98 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1959
In State, by Lord, v. Radosevich, 249 Minn. 268 , 82 N. W. (2d) 70 , where the state sought to obtain the dismissal of appeal by a property owner on a mere technicality, this court said ( 249 Minn. 275 , 82 N. W. [2d] 74): “* * * The statute should not be construed so as to deprive a landowner of his day in court unless the clear language of the statute requires su