Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cameron v. Evans, 62 N.W.2d 793.

143 citing documents.

  • Newcomb v. Meiss 116 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1962
    The damages for injuries must have emanated from the second contact with the car and not because of the assault and battery.” In Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 64 , 100 N. W. (2d) 124, 128 , we reviewed the rules governing the sufficiency of instructions and cited Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793, 798 , where we said: *324 “* * * the charge of the trial court must be viewed in its entirety and from a practical and common-sense point of view.
  • Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
  • Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
    4 Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 209 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793, 798 .
  • Grant v. Malkerson Sales, Inc. 108 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1961
  • Grant v. Malkerson Sales, Inc. 108 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1961
    Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; Schneider v. The Texas Co. 244 Minn. 131 , 69 N. W. (2d) 329 .
  • Carpenter v. Nelson 101 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1960
  • Carpenter v. Nelson 101 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1960
    For example, in Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793, 798 , we approved the trial court’s charge that the jury “would have to be satisfied by a fair preponderance of the evidence that future disabilities would, to a reasonable certainty, ensue before recovery could be allowed for future disability.” *429 (Italics supplied.)
  • Manion v. Tweedy 100 N.W.2d 124 Minn. 1959
  • Manion v. Tweedy 100 N.W.2d 124 Minn. 1959
    The rules applicable generally to a review of instructions to a jury are summarized in Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793, 798 , where we said: “* * * charge of the trial court must be viewed in its entirety and from a practical and common-sense point of view.
  • Zaikaner v. Small 98 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1959
  • Zaikaner v. Small 98 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1959
    1 See, Riley v. Luedloff, 253 Minn. 447 , 92 N. W. (2d) 806 ; Larson v. Degner, 248 Minn. 59 , 78 N. W. (2d) 333 ; Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; 14 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Johnson v. Clement F. Sculley Construction Co. 95 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1959
  • Johnson v. Clement F. Sculley Construction Co. 95 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1959
    Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 .
  • Lesewski v. Nielsen 95 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1959
  • Lesewski v. Nielsen 95 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1959
    Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 .
  • Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
  • Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
    O’Neill v. Mund, 235 Minn. 112 , 49 N. W. (2d) 812 ; Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 ; Rampi v. Vevea, 229 Minn. 11 , 38 N. W. (2d) 297 ; Leman v. Standard Oil Co. 246 Minn. 271 , 74 N. W. (2d) 513 ; Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; Peterson v. Lang, 239 Minn. 319 , 58 N. W. (2d) 609 .
  • Derrick v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 89 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1958
  • Derrick v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 89 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1958
    See, Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; Hiber v. City of St.
  • Thomas v. Mueller 88 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1958
  • Thomas v. Mueller 88 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1958
    We have repeatedly held that the charge of the court must be viewed in its entirety and from a common-sense point of view, Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N.W.
  • Priewe v. Bartz 83 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1957
  • Priewe v. Bartz 83 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1957
    “All that is required is that the charge as a whole convey to the jury a clear and correct understanding of the law.” Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793, 798 .
  • Norby v. Klukow 81 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1957
  • Norby v. Klukow 81 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1957
    3 See, Knox v. City of Granite Falls, 245 Minn. 11 , 72 N. W. (2d) 67 ; Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793, 798 .
  • State v. Axilrod 79 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1956
  • State v. Axilrod 79 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1956
    See, Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793, 798 ; Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460, 469 , 57 N. W. (2d) 262, 268 .
  • Larson v. Degner 78 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1956
  • Larson v. Degner 78 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1956
    8 Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St.
  • Knox v. City of Granite Falls 72 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1955
  • Knox v. City of Granite Falls 72 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1955
    In Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793, 798 , we said: “* * * The trial court is allowed considerable latitude in the language used, and a new trial will not be granted where requested instructions are refused when the general charge fairly and correctly states the applicable law.
  • Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
  • Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
    Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; McBride v. St.
  • Schneider v. the Texas Co. 69 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1955
  • Schneider v. the Texas Co. 69 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1955
    See, Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91, 97 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504, 509 ; Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 204 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793, 796 .
  • Hagen v. Snow 69 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1955
  • Hagen v. Snow 69 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1955
    See, Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , 62 N. W. (2d) 798 , 798, and cases cited.
  • Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 68 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1955
  • Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 68 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1955
    15 M. S. A. 546.22 provides: “When a verdict is found for the plaintiff in an action for the recovery of money, or for the defendant when a counterclaim for the recovery of money is established beyond the amount of the plaintiff’s claim as established, the jury shall assess the amount of the recovery.” 16 Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; Kelley v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. 142 Minn. 44 , ; Gibson v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. 117 Minn. 143 , , 38 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Meemken v. O'HARA 66 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1954
  • Meemken v. O'HARA 66 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1954
    22 Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 .
  • Muggenburg v. Leighton 63 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1954
  • Muggenburg v. Leighton 63 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1954
    7 See, Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 233 Minn. 410 , 47 N. W. (2d) 180 .