Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn., 59 N.W.2d 883.

42 citing documents.

Minn. 2021
See Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Ass’n , (“Where two opposing inferences can be drawn with equal justification from the same circumstantial evidence[,] .
Cindy Ly, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Ass’n, 240 Minn. 60, 65, (explaining that “medical testimony which does nothing more than show a mere possibility, suspicion, or conjecture that such causal relation exists, without any foundation for the exclusion of other admittedly possible causes , provides no proper foundation for a finding of a causal c
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n 532 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n 532 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Welfare, Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Ass’n, 240 Minn. 60 , Board ofEduc.
Schopf v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 323 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1982
Hed v. Brockway Glass Co. 244 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1976
Hed v. Brockway Glass Co. 244 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1976
See, Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60
Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co. 208 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1973
Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co. 208 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1973
Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60
Pagett v. Northern Electric Supply Co. 167 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1969
Pagett v. Northern Electric Supply Co. 167 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1969
Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 .
Stahlberg v. Moe 166 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1969
Stahlberg v. Moe 166 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1969
Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60, 64 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883, 886 ; Kundiger v. Prudential Ins.
ENGLER BROS. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. L'Allier 159 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1968
ENGLER BROS. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. L'Allier 159 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1968
Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 .
Brown v. Kaminski 152 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1967
Brown v. Kaminski 152 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1967
3 See, Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424 , 101 N. W. (2d) 918 ; but cf. DeCourcy v. Trustees of Westminster Presbyterian Church, 270 Minn. 560 , 134 N. W. (2d) 326 ; Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 .
Filzen v. Nelson 149 N.W.2d 78 Minn. 1967
Filzen v. Nelson 149 N.W.2d 78 Minn. 1967
2 Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Assn. 240 Minn. 60, 67 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883, 887 .
Fitch v. FARMERS UNION G. TERM. ASS'N (AMBER MILL. D.) 143 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1966
Fitch v. FARMERS UNION G. TERM. ASS'N (AMBER MILL. D.) 143 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1966
Paul, 219 Minn. 87 , 16 N. W. (2d) 878 ; Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 , we nevertheless find the evidence adequate to support the commission’s finding of a causal relationship between the conditions of employment and occupational disease and between the occupational disease and the death of the employee.
DeCourcy v. Trustees of the Westminster Presbyterian Church, Inc. 134 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1965
DeCourcy v. Trustees of the Westminster Presbyterian Church, Inc. 134 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1965
Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 .
Daly v. Bergstedt 126 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1964
Daly v. Bergstedt 126 N.W.2d 242 Minn. 1964
1 See, Gaetz v. City of Melrose, 155 Minn. 330 , ; Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 ; Austin v. Red Wing Sewer Pipe Co. 163 Minn. 397 , ; Pittman v. Pillsbury Flour Mills, Inc. 234 Minn. 517 , 48 N. W. (2d) 735 ; Halper v. The Golden Rule, 180 Minn. 477 , ; Storing v. Hotel Radisson Co. 177 Minn. 519 , ; Hertz v. Watab Paper Co. 180 Minn.
Gerhardt v. Welch 125 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1964
Gerhardt v. Welch 125 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1964
4 Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 .
Sauke v. Bird 125 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1963
Sauke v. Bird 125 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1963
1 Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60, 67 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883, 887 .
Risnes v. Stonebreaker 110 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1961
Risnes v. Stonebreaker 110 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1961
Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265 , ; Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 ; Whitman v. Speckel, 237 Minn. 36 , 53 N. W. (2d) 558 .
Jensen v. Linner 108 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1961
Jensen v. Linner 108 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1961
indings by the jury including proximate cause are sufficiently compelled by the evidence as a whole on the record before us. To support his contention that expert medical testimony is required to show causal connection here appellant cites: Williamson v. Andrews, 198 Minn. 349 , ; Nelson v. Nicollet Clinic, 201 Minn. 505 , ; and Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 .
Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. 79 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1956
Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. 79 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1956
He relies on Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60, 64, 67 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883, 886, 887 , where we said: * * Where expert testimony must be solely relied on to show the causal connection between the alleged cause and a certain subsequent result * * *, medical testimony which does nothing more than show a mere possibility, suspicion, or conjecture that such causal rel
McDonough v. Newmans Cloak & Suit Co. 77 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1956
McDonough v. Newmans Cloak & Suit Co. 77 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1956
Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 .
Swigerd v. City of Ortonville 75 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1956
Swigerd v. City of Ortonville 75 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1956
Paul, 219 Minn. 87 , 16 N. W. (2d) 878 ; Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60, 65 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883, 886 ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909.
Sullivan v. Hagstrom Construction Co. 69 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1955
Sullivan v. Hagstrom Construction Co. 69 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1955
In Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 , this court said that, in order to have a proper foundation for a finding of causal connection in cases where such connection must be established solely by expert testimony, the medical expert must, upon an adequate factual foundation, testify not only that in his professional opinion the injury i

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by