DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bollenbach, 63 N.W.2d 278.

44 citing documents.

  • In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
  • Souhsiung Jack Chiu, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    Erroneous findings or omitted findings that are not controlling on the outcome of the case “are harmless and do not necessitate a reversal nor would any useful purpose be served by remanding the case for corrected or additional findings.” State by Burnquist v. Bollenbach , 241 Minn. 103, 110
  • Bradley Wayne Foster v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services 857 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • Bradley Wayne Foster v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services 857 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    Burnquist v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 109, ).
  • Coker v. Jesson 831 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 2013
  • Explained Coker v. Jesson 831 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 2013
    Burnquist v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 109
  • In Re Kaldahl 418 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • In Re Kaldahl 418 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    See State v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 123
  • State v. Kaldahl 381 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Kaldahl 381 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Following the parties’ partial stipulation to facts and submission of legal memoranda, the trial court, sitting without a jury, determined that Lake Five was a private body of water since State v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , and that Kaldahl had not violated Minn.Stat.
  • Partnership Investments of Minnesota, Inc. v. Lybeck 243 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1976
  • Partnership Investments of Minnesota, Inc. v. Lybeck 243 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1976
    State, by Burn-quist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103
  • In Re Probate Court, Hennepin County 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
  • Balafas v. Angelos 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
  • In Re Probate Court, Hennepin County 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
    [3] See, also, State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371 , State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103
  • Balafas v. Angelos 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
    See, also, State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371 , State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103
  • Shair-A-Plane v. Harrison 189 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1971
  • Shair-A-Plane v. Harrison 189 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1971
    Rule 52.01; State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 .
  • Bartlett v. Stalker Lake Sportsmen's Club 168 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1969
  • Bartlett v. Stalker Lake Sportsmen's Club 168 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1969
    Plaintiffs argue that the conclusion of the trial court on the right of defendants to hunt on the lake in effect overrules State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 .
  • State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
    The state relies on State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 , for the proposition that the court will not review objections made for the first time on appeal.
  • Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
  • Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
    Co. 237 Minn. 332, 342 , 54 N. W. (2d) 912, 918 , wherein this court said: “Whether a body of water is navigable for the purpose of determining title is a federal question, and the federal, not the state, tests of navigability must be applied.” The latest case prior to the Adams case was State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 116 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278, 287 , in which we again said: “Navigability for purposes of determining title to water beds is a federal question controlled by the fed
  • Johnson v. Seifert 100 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1960
  • Johnson v. Seifert 100 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1960
    The trial court cited as authority for its decision Lamprey v. Danz, 86 Minn. 317 , , and State, by Burn *163 quist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 .
  • First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. McLean 93 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1958
  • First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. McLean 93 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1958
    Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143 , 59 N. W. (2d) 841 ; State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 .
  • Lundin v. Stratmoen 85 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1957
  • Lundin v. Stratmoen 85 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1957
    5 State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 124 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278, 291 ; Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 .
  • State v. Adams 89 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1957
  • Johnson v. Quaal 83 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1957
  • Johnson v. Quaal 83 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1957
    10 See, State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 ; Murray v. Wilson, 227 Minn. 365 , 35 N. W. (2d) 521 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • State v. Adams 89 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1957
    Rules Of Law Involved In State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 109 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278, 283 , we said: “In reviewing findings of fact, the rule in this state prior to the adoption of the new rules of civil procedure has been that the findings must be upheld if they are reasonably sustained in the light of the evidence as a whole.
  • Ketterer v. Independent School District No. 1 79 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1956
  • Ketterer v. Independent School District No. 1 79 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1956
    See, State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 ; Wright, Minnesota Rules, pp. 294, 295.
  • State v. EAH 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
  • State v. E. A. H. 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
  • State v. EAH 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
    [9] Rule 52.01 of Rules of Civil Procedure; State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 109 , 63 N.W.
  • State v. E. A. H. 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
    Rule 52.01 of Rules of Civil Procedure; State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 109 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278, 283 ; Sommers v. City of St.
  • Lindahl v. State 70 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1955
  • Lindahl v. State 70 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1955
    State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 110 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278, 283 ; 2 Youngquist & Blacik, Minnesota Rules Practice, p. 648; Wright, Minnesota Rules, p. 296.
  • Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. 64 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
  • Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. 64 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
    No action shall lie against the Company unless, as a condition precedent thereto, the Insured shall have fully complied with all of the terms of this Policy , * * 5 Rule 52.01 of Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, * * See, State, by Burnquist v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 .