Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co., 63 N.W.2d 380.

43 citing documents.

Gene Stengel, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Stengel asserts that the supreme court’s supports his argument.
State v. Plummer 511 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Plummer 511 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co., 241 Minn. 468, 473 , pet.
State Ex Rel. Humprey v. Briggs 488 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State Ex Rel. Humprey v. Briggs 488 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co., 241 Minn. 468, 473
Van Gordon v. Herzog 410 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Van Gordon v. Herzog 410 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
); Johnson v. Brand Stores, Inc., 241 Minn. 388, 392-93 , -74 (1954) (in action to recover for injuries sustained when plaintiff tripped over a scale, “[i]t was for the jury to say whether she should have looked at the floor or not and to determine whether, under the circumstances, [she] was excused from seeing that which plainly was in sight.”); Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co., 241 Minn. 468, 477-78 , (in action for injuries resulting from fall on icy spot in driveway of defendant’s grain eleva
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1973
Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1973
Berry v. Haertel 170 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1969
Berry v. Haertel 170 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1969
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380 .
Nelson v. Nelson 166 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1969
Nelson v. Nelson 166 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1969
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380 ; Hanson v. Homeland Ins.
Peckskamp v. McDowall 165 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1969
Peckskamp v. McDowall 165 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1969
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380 .
State v. Baker 160 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1968
Followed State v. Baker 160 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1968
Co. 241 Minn. 468, 478 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380, 386 .
Stephenson v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 152 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1967
Stephenson v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 152 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1967
The defendant must show that the plaintiff had knowledge of the risk, Guile v. *193 Greenberg, 192 Minn. 548 , appreciated it, Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co., 241 Minn. 468 , Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co., 235 Minn. 20 , and, having opportunity either to incur it or avoid it, voluntarily chose to incur it.
Knutson v. Arrigoni Brothers Co. 147 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1966
Knutson v. Arrigoni Brothers Co. 147 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1966
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380 .
Bonniwell v. SAINT PAUL UNION STOCKYARDS COMPANY 135 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1965
Bonniwell v. SAINT PAUL UNION STOCKYARDS COMPANY 135 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1965
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380 ; Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N. W. (2d) 247 ; *239 Mattson v. St.
Lieser v. Northern States Power Co. 128 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1964
Lieser v. Northern States Power Co. 128 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1964
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380 ; Trimbo v. Minnesota Valley Natural Gas Co. 260 Minn. 386 , 110 N. W. (2d) 168 .
Gothe v. Murray 109 N.W.2d 350 Minn. 1961
Gothe v. Murray 109 N.W.2d 350 Minn. 1961
She cites Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 241 Minn. 468, 471 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380, 383 , wherein this court said: “The rule in this state is that a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict will be granted only when the evidence is conclusive against the verdict.” It is her position that when the evidence in the instant case is viewed in the light most favorable to th
Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 90 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1958
Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 90 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1958
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380 .
Segal v. Bloom Brothers Co. 82 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1957
Segal v. Bloom Brothers Co. 82 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1957
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380 ; Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. *373 77, 5 N. W. (2d) 355 .
Fulsom v. Egner 79 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1956
Fulsom v. Egner 79 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1956
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380 .
Davies v. Land O' Lakes Racing Ass'n 69 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1955
Davies v. Land O' Lakes Racing Ass'n 69 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1955
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380 , and cases therein cited.
Jensen v. Dikel 69 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1955
Jensen v. Dikel 69 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1955
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380 .
Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 68 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1955
Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 68 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1955
Co. 241 Minn. 468 , 68 N. W. (2d) 380 .
Schmanski v. Church of St. Casimir of Wells 67 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1954
Schmanski v. Church of St. Casimir of Wells 67 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1954
Co. 241 Minn. 468, 473 , 63 N. W. (2d) 380, 384 , we said: “* * * A possessor of premises used by business visitors, while not an insurer of their safety, is bound to exercise reasonable care to construct and to maintain his premises in a reasonably safe condition for their use.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by