DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hurr v. Johnston, 65 N.W.2d 193.

30 citing documents.

  • Richard Adams, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    See Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc., –50 (Minn. 1989) (conditional additur); Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329, 336, ( district court may grant new trial on damages).4 Unconditional additur is not authorized.
  • In re the Civil Commitment of Ince 847 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 2014
  • In re the Civil Commitment of Ince 847 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 2014
    5 Cf. Hurt v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329, 337 , (holding that a “new trial on all the issues here [would] be in the interests of justice” because “[b]oth sides are entitled to a fair, impartial, conscientious consideration of all the evidence”).
  • Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
  • Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
    at 155 , d at 533-34 ; Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329
  • Pehrson v. Kistner 222 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1974
  • Pehrson v. Kistner 222 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1974
    Walser v. Vinge, 275 Minn. 230 , Seydel v. Reuber, 254 Minn. 168 , Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , *303 (1954).
  • Schore v. Mueller 186 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1971
  • Schore v. Mueller 186 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1971
    Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 ; Caswell v. Minar Motor Co. 240 Minn. 213 , 60 N. W. (2d) 263 ; Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 .
  • Smith v. Rekucki 177 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1970
  • Smith v. Rekucki 177 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1970
    *156 Plaintiffs have cited Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 , as sustaining their position that the verdicts rendered in the instant case were entirely inadequate.
  • Kloos v. Soo Line Railroad 176 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1970
  • Kloos v. Soo Line Railroad 176 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1970
    It was pointed out in Seydel v. Reuber, 254 Minn. 168 , 94 N. W. (2d) 265, 266 , that “an additur increasing the verdict will not cure the deficiency if the amount of the recovery, in spite of the additur, still remains less than the amount of the special damages proved” and that a “mere nominal award will not suffice if substantial general damages are proved.” In Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 , we held that where the damages incurred, both general and special, were a direc
  • Sessler v. Goldfarb 167 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1969
  • Sessler v. Goldfarb 167 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1969
    Hill v. Ross, 198 Minn. 199 , ; Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc. 202 Minn. 615 , ; Caswell v. Minar Motor Co. 240 Minn. 213 , 60 N. W. (2d) 263 ; Stacy v. Goff, 241 Minn. 301 , 62 N. W. (2d) 920 ; Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 ; Fortier v. Newman, 248 Minn. 69 , 78 N. W. (2d) 382 ; Seydel v. Reuber, 254 Minn. 168 , 94 N. W. (2d) 265 ; Walser v. Vinge, 275 Minn. 230 , 146 N. W. (2d) 537 .
  • Swanson v. Thill 152 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1967
  • Walser v. Vinge 146 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
  • Walser v. Vinge 146 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
    Among the more recent cases reviewed by this court which relate to the inadequacy of verdicts allegedly resulting from passion and prejudice of the jury are Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 ; Seydel v. Reuber, 254 Minn. 168 , 94 N. W. (2d) 265 ; Dziuk v. Loehrer, 266 Minn. 153 , 123 N. W. (2d) 86 ; Stacy v. Goff, 241 Minn. 301 , 62 N. W. (2d) 920 ; and Krueger v. Knutson, 261 Minn. 144 , 111 N. W. (2d) 526 .
  • Backman v. Fitch 137 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1965
  • Backman v. Fitch 137 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1965
    Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc. 202 Minn. 615 , ; Olson v. Christiansen, 230 Minn. 198 , 41 N. W. (2d) 248 ; Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Prodger v. Zell 113 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1962
  • Prodger v. Zell 113 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1962
    Nor are Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 , and Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 , of *514 any help to defendant.
  • Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
  • Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
    Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 ; 14 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Seydel v. Reuber 94 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1959
  • Seydel v. Reuber 94 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1959
    1 Other cases where this court has approved or granted new trials on the grounds of inadequate verdicts are: Fortier v. Newman, 248 Minn. 69 , 78 N. W. (2d) 382 ; Greenberg v. Holfeltz, 244 Minn. 175 , 69 N. W. (2d) 369 ; Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 ; Thiesen v. Hellermann, 242 Minn. 218 , 64 N. W. (2d) 762 ; Stacy v. Goff, 241 Minn. 301 , 62 N. W. (2d) 920 ; Caswell v. Minar Motor Co. 240 Minn. 213 , 60 N. W. (2d) 263 ; Willett v. Seerup, 151 Minn. 105 , ; Siverts v. Dah
  • Berg v. Ullevig 70 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1955
  • Berg v. Ullevig 70 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1955
    And whether a new trial upon the ground of excessive or inadequate damages should be granted or refused or whether the verdict should be reduced or increased rests in the sound judicial discretion of the trial court.” Plaintiffs on appeal have cited the case of Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 , a recent decision of this court where a new trial was ordered as sustaining their position that the verdicts rendered in the instant case were entirely inadequate.
  • Greenberg v. Holfeltz 69 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1955
  • Greenberg v. Holfeltz 69 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1955
    In Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 , verdicts were returned for the wife for her personal injuries and for the husband for damages to his automobile and other items of special damage.