DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brannan v. Shertzer, 64 N.W.2d 755.

34 citing documents.

  • Herbert B. Fick, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    “There is no fixed standard by which loss for injuries can be determined.” Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 287, d 755, 761 (1954).
  • Raze v. Mueller 587 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1999
  • Raze v. Mueller 587 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1999
    See also Walser v. Vinge, 275 Minn. 230, 235 , (concluding that a jury must take into consideration all of the elements of damage which the plaintiff proved); Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 283-84 , -60 (1954) (determining that the plaintiff did not prove substantial general damages because "her symptoms and ailments antedated the accident and were in no way related to it.”).
  • Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
  • Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
    10 See, e. g., Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , Stacy v. Goff, 241 Minn. 301
  • Kinning v. Sutton 220 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 1974
  • Kinning v. Sutton 220 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 1974
    Krueger v. Knutson, 261 Minn. 144 , Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277
  • Gibson v. Sandstrom 216 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1974
  • Gibson v. Sandstrom 216 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1974
    Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277
  • Bastianson v. Forschen 196 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1972
  • Bastianson v. Forschen 196 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1972
    1 Dale v. Pushor, 246 Minn. 254 , Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , Anderson v. Minneapolis, St.
  • Jacoboski v. Prax 187 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1971
  • Jacoboski v. Prax 187 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1971
    Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; Bryant v. N. P. Ry.
  • Weiss v. Great Northern Railway Company 176 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1970
  • Weiss v. Great Northern Railway Company 176 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1970
    Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; Gardner v. Germain, 264 Minn. 61 , 117 N. W. (2d) 759 ; Bryant v. N. P. Ry.
  • Vanderlinde v. Wehle 144 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1966
  • Vanderlinde v. Wehle 144 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1966
    Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; Hallada v. G. N. Ry.
  • Backman v. Fitch 137 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1965
  • Backman v. Fitch 137 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1965
    Mr. Justice Knutson, speaking for this court in Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 287 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755, 761 , said: “* * * A verdict cannot be set aside simply because this court may be of the opinion that it was not adequate.
  • Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
  • Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
    This court in Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 287 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755, 761 , said: “* * * A verdict cannot be set aside simply because this court may be of the opinion that it was not adequate.
  • Webster v. Schwartz 81 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1957
  • Webster v. Schwartz 81 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1957
    3 *230 However, in Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 281 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755, 757 , in considering Rule 15.01, we stated: “Rule 15.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a party, after a responsive pleading has been served, may amend his pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party.
  • Genzel v. Halvorson 80 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1957
  • Genzel v. Halvorson 80 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1957
    Berg v. Ullevig, 244 Minn. 390 , 70 N. W. (2d) 133 ; Greenberg v. Holfeltz, 244 Minn. 175 , 69 N. W. (2d) 369 ; Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 .
  • Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. Pushor 75 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1956
  • Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. Pushor 75 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1956
    7 The footnotes referred to in the above quotation are as follows: “8 Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; 1 Youngquist & Blacik, Minnesota Rules Practice, p. 476.
  • Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
  • Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
    Colstad v. Levine, 248 Minn. 279 , 67 N. W. (2d) 648 ; Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; see, Wright, Minnesota Rules, p. 101.
  • Berg v. Ullevig 70 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1955
  • Berg v. Ullevig 70 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1955
    This court in the recent case of Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277, 287 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755, 761 , in discussing the inadequacy or the excessiveness of verdicts, said: “* * * ^ verdict cannot be set aside simply because this court may be of the opinion that it was not adequate.
  • Colstad v. Levine 67 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1954
  • Colstad v. Levine 67 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1954
    8 Brannan v. Shertzer, 242 Minn. 277 , 64 N. W. (2d) 755 ; 1 Yonngquist & Blacik, Minnesota Rules Practice, p. 476.
  • Meemken v. O'HARA 66 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1954