Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jurgensen v. Schirmer Transportation Co., 64 N.W.2d 530.

30 citing documents.

Rogers v. Ponti-Peterson Post 1720 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States of America, Inc. 495 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rogers v. Ponti-Peterson Post 1720 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States of America, Inc. 495 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., 242 Minn. 157, 166 , (offended party ordinarily must suggest to the trial court, before the jury retires, that part of the argument which he considers objectionable and must request proper or appropriate instructions to correct the claimed errors).
State, Ex Rel. Pula v. Beehler 364 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State, Ex Rel. Pula v. Beehler 364 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Jurgensen v. Schirmer Transportation Co., 242 Minn. 157, 166 , (quoting Eilola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 201 Minn. 77, 80 , 275 N.W.
Boland v. Morrill 132 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1965
Boland v. Morrill 132 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1965
Co. 242 Minn. 157 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Wilson v. Sorge, 256 Minn. 125 , 97 N. W. (2d) 477 .
Pautz v. American Insurance Co. 128 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1964
Pautz v. American Insurance Co. 128 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1964
Co. 242 Minn. 157 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Eilola v. Oliver Iron Min.
Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
Co. 242 Minn. 157 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Mayor and Aldermen of Town of Morristown v. Inman, 47 Tenn.
Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
Co. 242 Minn. 157, 162 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530, 534 ; Schubitzke v. Minneapolis, St.
Pelzer v. Lange 93 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1958
Pelzer v. Lange 93 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1958
Co. 242 Minn. 157 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Eilola v. Oliver Iron Min.
Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
Co. 242 Minn. 157 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Schubitzke v. Minneapolis, St.
Gruenhagen v. Brelje 89 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1958
Gruenhagen v. Brelje 89 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1958
Co. 242 Minn. 157 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Hardy v. Anderson, 241 Minn. 478 , 63 N. W. (2d) 814 .
Faust Ex Rel. Faust v. Przybilla 77 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1956
Faust Ex Rel. Faust v. Przybilla 77 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1956
Co. 242 Minn. 157, 162 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530, 534 ; Schubitzke v. Minneapolis, St.
Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 77 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1956
Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 77 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1956
Co. 242 Minn. 157 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Eiola v. Oliver I. Min.
Shastid v. Shue 77 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1956
Shastid v. Shue 77 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1956
Co. 242 Minn. 157, 162 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530, 534 , we limited the Orrvar case as follows: “* * * We feel that the Orrvar case has been distinguished so often that it can no longer be considered, as an authority except in the limited field covered by its facts.” (Italics supplied.)
Markle v. Haase 73 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
Markle v. Haase 73 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
Co. 242 Minn. 157 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Hogle v. City of Minneapolis, supra.
Schubitzke v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 69 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1955
Schubitzke v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 69 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1955
Co. 242 Minn. 157, 162 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530, 534 , we said: “* * * We feel that the Orrvar case has been distinguished so often that it can no longer be considered as an authority except in the limited field covered by its facts.” To adopt the “range of vision” rule as a rigid formula to be applied regardless of the circumstances would
Beebe v. Kleidon 65 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1954
Beebe v. Kleidon 65 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1954
Co. 242 Minn. 157, 166 , 64 N. W. (2d) 530, 535 .