Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co., 68 N.W.2d 385.
- Galaxy Wireless, LLC v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company 8 N.W.3d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Galaxy Wireless, LLC v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company 8 N.W.3d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Connexus Energy, Relators v. Commissioner of Revenue 868 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 2015
-
Connexus Energy, Relators v. Commissioner of Revenue
868 N.W.2d 234
Minn. 2015
Co., 243 Minn. 430, 438-39, see also Nielsen v. 2003 Honda Accord, (stating that the canon does not apply when it is contrary to the “manifest intent of the Legislature”).
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLC 827 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 2013
-
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLC
827 N.W.2d 766
Minn. 2013
Co., 243 Minn. 430, 433 , (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLC 812 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLC 812 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A. 607 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2000
-
Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A.
607 N.W.2d 440
Minn. 2000
Co., 243 Minn. 430, 439, (concluding where two insurance statutes conflicted, one applicable to.
- Crowell v. Delafield Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. 463 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1990
-
Crowell v. Delafield Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
463 N.W.2d 737
Minn. 1990
Co., 243 Minn. 430, 440 , (insurable interest exists if insured will suffer loss regardless of title, lien, or possession).
- Hertog v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 415 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Hertog v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.
415 N.W.2d 370
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Paul Mutual Insurance Co., 243 Minn. 430, 433-34
- Casablanca Concerts, Inc. v. American National General Agencies, Inc. 407 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Anderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 397 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Anderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
397 N.W.2d 416
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Paul Mutual Insurance Co., 243 Minn. 430 , the supreme court stated that “all [the plaintiff] had to show in order to establish an insurable interest was that she would suffer a loss by the destruction of the building * * Id.
- Schmidt v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 376 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Schmidt v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
376 N.W.2d 237
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Paul Mutual Insurance Co., 243 Minn. 430
- Hane v. Hallock Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. 258 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1977
- Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis v. Maher 258 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1977
-
Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis v. Maher
258 N.W.2d 623
Minn. 1977
Paul Mutual Insurance Company, 243 Minn. 430, 431
-
Hane v. Hallock Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.
258 N.W.2d 779
Minn. 1977
Paul Mutual Insurance Co., 243 Minn. 430
- Ehlert v. Graue 195 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 1972
- Ehlert v. Graue 195 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 1972
- Brooks Upholstering Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co. 149 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1967
-
Brooks Upholstering Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co.
149 N.W.2d 502
Minn. 1967
Co. 243 Minn. 430 , 68 N. W. (2d) 385 , and Board of First Congregational Church v. Cream City Mutual Ins.
- Board of Trustees of First Congregational Church v. Cream City Mutual Insurance 96 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1959
-
Board of Trustees of First Congregational Church v. Cream City Mutual Insurance
96 N.W.2d 690
Minn. 1959
Co. 243 Minn. 430 , 68 N. W. (2d) 385 , that what constitutes an increase of risk is a factual question for the finder of fact unless the increase is obvious, and we will not reverse such a finding unless it is manifestly contrary to the evidence.
- Esbjornsson v. Buffalo Insurance Co. 89 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1958
-
Esbjornsson v. Buffalo Insurance Co.
89 N.W.2d 893
Minn. 1958
Co. 243 Minn. 430, 436 , 68 N. W. (2d) 385, 390 , this court pointed out that, although under the “valued policy” statute (M. S. A. 65.05) conditions which are reasonably discoverable by an inspection at the time a policy is issued or renewed cannot be shown as proof that the insured committed intentional fraud or misrepresentations in
- Antell v. PEARL ASSURANCE CO. LTD. 89 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1958
-
Antell v. PEARL ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
89 N.W.2d 726
Minn. 1958
Co. 243 Minn. 430, 431 , 68 N. W. (2d) 385, 387 , we recently held, following the Banner Laundry Co. case, that: “It is not necessary that the insured have an absolute right of property in order to have an insurable interest.
- Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance 86 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1957
-
Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance
86 N.W.2d 503
Minn. 1957
Co. 243 Minn. 430 , 68 N. W. (2d) 385 .