Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad, 68 N.W.2d 873.
- Cox v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. 84 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1957
-
Cox v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.
84 N.W.2d 263
Minn. 1957
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1, 26, 27 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873, 889 , we pointed out that, under the ineffective legal generalities which supposedly delineate the area of appellate review of damages, “plaintiffs in recent years have successfully resisted appellate attack on increasingly large personal injury verdicts” and stated that “by lack of a defi
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
-
Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.
80 N.W.2d 30
Minn. 1956
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 , and Hallada v. G. N. Ry.
- Larson v. Degner 78 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1956
-
Larson v. Degner
78 N.W.2d 333
Minn. 1956
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 .
- LeMay v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 71 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1955
-
LeMay v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
71 N.W.2d 826
Minn. 1955
P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 244 Minn. 1 , 68 N. W. (2d) 873 , we pointed out that damages for total loss of future earning capacity should be predicated upon a person’s future earning power and his age, skill, training, and experience; that his industry also should be considered; and that proof of specific pecuniary loss is not essential.