Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Adelmann v. Elk River Lumber Co., 65 N.W.2d 661.

34 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mervel George Jones, III, Appellant Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mervel George Jones, III, Appellant Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1997
Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1997
Cf. Adelmann v. Elk River Lumber Co., 242 Minn. 388, 392 , Larkin v. City of Minneapolis, 112 Minn. 311, 315 , *48 127 N.W.
Wadena v. Bush 232 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1975
Wadena v. Bush 232 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1975
Co. 242 Minn. 388, 391 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661, 664 .
Eklund v. Lund 222 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1974
Eklund v. Lund 222 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1974
Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of Minneapolis 214 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1974
Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of Minneapolis 214 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1974
Bachman v. Lieser 184 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1971
Bachman v. Lieser 184 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1971
Co. 242 Minn. 388, 391 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661, 664 .
Clifford v. Peterson 149 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1967
Clifford v. Peterson 149 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1967
Co. 242 Minn. 388, 396 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661, 667 .
Ronningen v. Sonterre 143 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1966
Koenigs v. Werner 134 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1964
Koenigs v. Werner 134 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1964
Co. 242 Minn. 388 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661 , the failure of the trial court to read § 169.14, subd.
Daigle v. Twin City Ready Mix Concrete Co. 128 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1964
Daigle v. Twin City Ready Mix Concrete Co. 128 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1964
Co. 242 Minn. 388 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661 ; State, by Lord, v. Bradac, 257 Minn. 467 , 102 N. W. (2d) 34 ; Wozniak v. Luta, 258 Minn. 234 , 103 N. W. (2d) 870 ; Olson v. Penkert, 252 Minn. 334 , 90 N. W. (2d) 193 .
Schlukebier v. LaClair 127 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1964
Schlukebier v. LaClair 127 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1964
Co. 242 Minn. 388 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661 .
Herbst v. Suilman 107 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1961
Herbst v. Suilman 107 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1961
Co. 242 Minn. 388 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661 ; State, by Lord, v. Bradac, 257 Minn. 467 , 102 N. W. (2d) 34 ; Wozniak v. Luta, 258 Minn. 234 , 103 N. W. (2d) 870 .
Wolle v. Jorgenson 99 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1959
Wolle v. Jorgenson 99 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1959
Co. 242 Minn. 388 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661 ; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 , in support thereof, and directing attention to the fact that in Norton v. Nelson, supra, this court expressed the exact rule included in the requested instruction.
Anderson v. Mid-Motors, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1959
Anderson v. Mid-Motors, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1959
Co. 242 Minn. 388 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661 ; Jablinske v. Eckstrom, 247 Minn. 140 , 76 N. W. (2d) 654 (forfeiture of right-of-way).
City of Yuma v. Evans 336 P.2d 135 Ariz. 1959
Donald v. Moses 94 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1959
Donald v. Moses 94 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1959
Co. 242 Minn. 388 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661 ; Storey v. Weinberg, 226 Minn. 48 , 31 N. W. (2d) 912 ; Greene v. Mathiowetz, 212 Minn. 171 , 3 N. W. (2d) 97 ; Donovan v. Ogston, 239 Minn. 553 , 59 N. W. (2d) 672 ; Hess v. Koskovitch, 241 Minn. 174 , 62 N. W. (2d) 806 ; Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc. 241 Minn. 79 , 62 N. W. (2d) 492 ; Pet
Sonntag v. Adkinson 87 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1958
Sonntag v. Adkinson 87 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1958
Co. 242 Minn. 388 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661 ; Zurko v. Gilquist, 241 Minn. 1 , 62 N. W. (2d) 351 .
Francis v. Wilson 83 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1957
Francis v. Wilson 83 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1957
Co. 242 Minn. 388 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661 , we said that a trial court’s erroneous statement of evidence upon a pivotal fact which might have had, under the surrounding circumstances, an important bearing on the evaluation of the evidence by a jury was ground for a new trial.