Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 65 N.W.2d 647.

67 citing documents.

Gephart v. Hospital Facility Building Commission 132 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1965
Any competitive bidding procedure which defeats this fundamental purpose, even though it be set forth in the initial proposal to all bidders, invalidates the construction contract although subsequent events establish, as in the instant case, that no actual fraud was present.” Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 242 Minn. 529, 535 , 65 N. W. (2d) 647, 652 .
Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Marshall 123 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1963
Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Marshall 123 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1963
3 Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 242 Minn. 529 , 65 N. W. (2d) 647 .
Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
Martinco v. Hastings 122 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1963
Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 242 Minn. 529 , 65 N. W. (2d) 647 ; City of St.
Leskinen v. Pucelj 115 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1962
Leskinen v. Pucelj 115 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1962
Paul, 223 Minn. 376 , 26 N. W. (2d) 835 ; Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 242 Minn. 529 , 65 N. W. (2d) 647 .
In re Proceedings to Contest Election Upon Amendment No. 17 to Charter 99 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1959
In re Proceedings to Contest Election Upon Amendment No. 17 to Charter 99 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1959
University of Minnesota v. Chase, 175 Minn. 259 , ; Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Nadasdy, 247 Minn. 159 , 76 N. W. (2d) 670 ; Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 242 Minn. 529 , 65 N. W. (2d) 647 ; Minneapolis-St.
Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 97 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1959
Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 97 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1959
It cites Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 242 Minn. 529 , 65 N. W. (2d) 647 , in which we held that although a county board was not required by statute to adopt competitive bidding procedures in contracting for the construction of a jail, once having adopted the competitive bidding method, it was obligated to pursue such method in a manner reasonably designed to accomplish
Gale v. City of St. Paul 96 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1959
Gale v. City of St. Paul 96 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1959
See, Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 242 Minn. 529 , 65 N. W. (2d) 647 .
State Ex Rel. Town of White Bear v. City of White Bear Lake 95 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. Town of White Bear v. City of White Bear Lake 95 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1959
Harrier v. Village of Spring Lake Park, 245 Minn. 302 , 71 N. W. (2d) 812 ; Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 242 Minn. 529 , 65 N. W. (2d) 647 ; Peterson v. Halvorson, 200 Minn. 253 , ; 17 Dunnell, Dig.
Nielsen v. City of St. Paul 88 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 1958
Nielsen v. City of St. Paul 88 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 1958
the purchasing agent at the time and place named in the advertisement in the presence of the mayor and the comptroller or their representatives and such *18 other persons as may be present; in the case of school purchases, bids shall be opened in the presence of the comptroller and of the Board of Education or their representatives.” This court in the recent case of Griswold v. County of Ramsey, 242 Minn. 529, 534 , 65 N. W. (2d) 647, 651 , said that: “* * * Subject to certain exceptions pertain

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by