Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hayes, 70 N.W.2d 110.

26 citing documents.

Peter Christiansen, a minor, by and through his parent and natural guardian, Brad Christiansen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296, 300, see also In re Welfare of M.B.
State of Minnesota v. Javon Lamar Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Javon Lamar Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
8 In State v. Hayes, the supreme court stated that the terms carelessness and negligence as used in the criminal context are synonymous and may be defined as “[n]ot taking ordinary or proper care” or “a lack of ordinary care; that is, lack of such care as a man of ordinary care would exercise under the particular circumstances of the case.” 244 Minn. 296, 299, (quotations omitted); -59 (Minn. 1979) (approving of a jury instruction defining negligence as “the failure to use that degree of care wh
State v. Grover 437 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1989
State v. Grover 437 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1989
ocess are satisfied by specifying standards of conduct in terms that have acquired meaning involving reasonably definite standards either according to the common law or by long and general usage” and that “[njegligence as a test of criminal responsibility” constitutes “a sufficiently definite standard of criminal responsibility.” State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296
State v. Soto 378 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1985
State v. Soto 378 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1985
Forsman, d at 164 ; State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296 , -113 (1955).
In Re the Welfare of M.B.W. 364 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of M.B.W. 364 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296 , a case dealing with an accidental shooting while deer hunting, the supreme court stated that, in statutory language, “carelessness” connotes ordinary negligence.
State v. Munnell 344 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Munnell 344 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296 , the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of using an ordinary negligence standard in criminal statutes.
State v. Crace 289 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1979
State v. Crace 289 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1979
Although we have not previously addressed ourselves to the constitutionality of this statute, our decision is largely controlled by our discussion in State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296
State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc. 246 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1976
State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc. 246 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1976
See, also, State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296
State v. Tereau 229 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1975
State v. Tereau 229 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1975
State v. Meany, 262 Minn. 491 , ; State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296
State v. Meany 115 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1962
State v. Meany 115 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1962
9 State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296 , 70 N. W. (2d) 110 ; Smith v. Hubbard, 253 Minn. 215 , 91 N. W. (2d) 756 .
City of St. Paul v. Morris 104 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1960
State v. Cunningham 99 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1959
State v. Cunningham 99 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1959
See, e. g., State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296 , 70 N. W. (2d) 110 ; State v. Arnold, 182 Minn. 313 , ; State v. Rollins, 80 Minn. 216, 218 , .
State v. Moseng 95 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1959
State v. Moseng 95 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1959
Also see, United States v. Lacher, 134 U. S. 624 , 10 S. Ct. 625 , 33 L. ed. 1080; State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296 , 70 N. W. (2d) 110 ; State v. Evans, 154 Minn. 95 , , 27 A. L. R. 1165; State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N. W. (2d) 554 , 162 A. L. R. 477, with Annotation at 495; 50 Am.
Smith v. Hubbard 91 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1958
Smith v. Hubbard 91 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1958
State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296 , 70 N. W. (2d) 110 .