DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Beck v. Groe, 70 N.W.2d 886.

137 citing documents.

  • Trail v. Village of Elk River 175 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1970
    The trial court, in granting the motion for directed verdict, said that “the law does not define 3.2 beer as intoxicating liquor, it defines 3.2 beer as non-intoxicating.” As plaintiff points out, it is likely the trial court was relying upon Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875.
  • Hempstead v. Minneapolis Sheraton Corporation 166 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1969
  • Hempstead v. Minneapolis Sheraton Corporation 166 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1969
    Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875.
  • Turk v. Long Branch Saloon, Inc. 159 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1968
  • Turk v. Long Branch Saloon, Inc. 159 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1968
    3 Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L, R. (2d) 875; Kvanli v. Village of Watson, 272 Minn. 481 , 139 N. W. (2d) 275 .
  • Kvanli v. Village of Watson 139 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1965
  • Kvanli v. Village of Watson 139 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1965
    2 See, Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28, 35 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886, 892 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875; Note, 46 Minn. L. Rev. 169 , 181.
  • Glaesemann v. Village of New Brighton 130 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1964
  • Glaesemann v. Village of New Brighton 130 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1964
    See, Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875; Bundy v. City of Fridley, 265 Minn. 549 , 122 N. W. (2d) 585 ; State Farm Mutual Auto.
  • Herbes v. Village of Holdingford 125 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1963
  • Herbes v. Village of Holdingford 125 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1963
    In that case we reviewed prior decisions, including Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875; Philips v. Aretz, 215 Minn. 325 , 10 N. W. (2d) 226 ; and Mayes v. Byers, 214 Minn. 54 , 7 N. W. (2d) 403 , 144 A. L. R. 821.
  • Bundy v. City of Fridley 122 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1963
  • Bundy v. City of Fridley 122 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1963
    The distinctions between damages recoverable under the Civil Damage Act and the death-by-wrongful-act statute are discussed in Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28, 34 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886, 892 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875, 883, where we pointed out: “By the wrongful death act the surviving spouse and next of kin are given rights within the limits of the statute to recover damages measured by the monetary loss to those who come within its provisions.
  • Dahl v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK MINNEAPOLIS 121 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1963
  • Dahl v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK MINNEAPOLIS 121 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1963
    It is this dictum in Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28, 36 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886, 892 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875, upon which plaintiff relies.
  • Murphy v. Hennen 119 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1963
  • Murphy v. Hennen 119 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1963
    6 Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875; Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, supra.
  • Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 115 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1962
  • Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 115 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1962
    Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875.
  • Lund v. Village of Watson 109 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1961
  • Lund v. Village of Watson 109 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1961
    3 In Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28, 34 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886, 891 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875, we said that the Civil Damage Act “is one highly penal in its nature” and that ( 245 Minn. 36 , 70 N. W. [2d] 892) “it is a means provided by statute to impose a penalty on a dealer of intoxicating liquor based upon contract.” We have also said that recovery against
  • Shumway v. Nelson 107 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 1961
  • Shumway v. Nelson 107 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 1961
    (2d) 315 ; Whitford v. Panama R. Co. 23 N. Y. 465, 470 , construing similar language; Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28, 35 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886, 892 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875; Keiper v. Anderson, 138 Minn. 392, 401 , , L. R. A. 1918C, 299, 303; Judson v. G. N. Ry.
  • State v. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. 103 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1960
  • State v. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. 103 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1960
    tention, we may look to the title as well as to the body of the statute.’ Attention has already been called to the restrictive character of the title.” As to the rule that the provisions of a complete and specific act in and of itself control a prior and general provision, and that if there is conflict between different statutes as to the same matter, the later statute prevails, see Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875.
  • Randall v. Village of Excelsior 103 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1960
  • Randall v. Village of Excelsior 103 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1960
    See, also, Stabs v. City of Tower, 229 Minn. 552 , 40 N. W. (2d) 362 ; Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875.
  • Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
  • Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
    1 M. S. A. 340.95, the Civil Damage Act of this state, has been construed by this court as to various questions that have arisen in connection with the act’s application in Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , 52 A. L. R. (2d) 875; Hahn v. City of Ortonville, 238 Minn. 428 , 57 N. W. (2d) 254 ; Fox v. Swartz, 228 Minn. 233 , 36 N. W. (2d) 708 ; Philips v. Aretz, 215 Minn. 325 , 10 N. W. (2d) 226 ; Mayes v. Byers, 214 Minn. 54 , 7 N. W. (2d) 403 , 144 A. L. R. 821; Sworski v. Colman,
  • In Re Application of Paulson 249 Minn. 236 Minn. 1957
  • In Re Application of Paulson 249 Minn. 236 Minn. 1957
    Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28, 43 , 70 N.W.
  • Adamson v. Dougherty 81 N.W.2d 110 Minn. 1957
  • Adamson v. Dougherty 81 N.W.2d 110 Minn. 1957
    See Mayes v. Beyers, 214 Minn. 54 , Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28
  • Dostal v. County of McLeod 77 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1956
  • Dostal v. County of McLeod 77 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1956
    In Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 , the trustee of the deceased, Ardell L. Beck, brought an action against Gerald D. Groe, The Prom, Inc., and others to recover for the death of deceased, which was alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of an automobile by Groe.
  • Strand v. Village of Watson 72 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1955
  • Strand v. Village of Watson 72 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1955
    2 Hahn v. City of Ortonville, 238 Minn. 428 , 57 N. W. (2d) 254 ; Beck v. Groe, 245 Minn. 28 , 70 N. W. (2d) 886 ; 30 Am.