Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 69 N.W.2d 636.

59 citing documents.

Niess v. Superior Packing Co. 81 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1957
2 Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 .
Fleischer v. State Department of Highways 77 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1956
Fleischer v. State Department of Highways 77 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1956
Golob v. Buckinghom Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 .
Schoch v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 76 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1956
Schoch v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 76 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1956
4 Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 ; Erickson v. Knutson, 237 Minn. 187 , 54 N. W. (2d) 118 ; Swanson v. American Hoist & Derrick Co. 214 Minn. 323 , 8 N. W. (2d) 24 .
Root v. City of Duluth 76 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1956
Root v. City of Duluth 76 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1956
A reference to the modern trend away from a strict interpretation of the unusual exertion rule may be found in Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 .
Erholtz v. Balkan Mining Co. 70 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1955
Distinguished Erholtz v. Balkan Mining Co. 70 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1955
2 We recently again had occasion to consider a case involving this question in Golob v. Buckingham Hotel, 244 Minn. 301 , 69 N. W. (2d) 636 .