Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bauer v. Kummer Ex Rel. Kummer, 70 N.W.2d 273.

28 citing documents.

ERICKSON BY ERICKSON v. Hammermeister 458 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
ERICKSON BY ERICKSON v. Hammermeister 458 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488, 492
Senf v. Bolluyt 419 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Senf v. Bolluyt 419 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
ANALYSIS I. “The general rule is that a jury verdict may not be impeached after the jury has been discharged when the facts sought to be shown inhere in the verdict itself.” (citing Bauer v. Kum *647 mer, 244 Minn. 488, 490-91 , ).
Zurn v. Hunt 409 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Zurn v. Hunt 409 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488 , the supreme court stated the general rule that no affidavit of a juror or any other person relating what a juror said will be received to impeach the verdict when the facts sought to be shown inhere in the verdict itself.
Bianchi v. Nordby 409 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1987
Bianchi v. Nordby 409 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1987
Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488, 490-91
Marriage of Egge v. Egge 361 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Egge v. Egge 361 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bauer v. Hummer, 244 Minn. 488, 492
Bergemann v. Mutual Service Insurance Co. 270 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1978
Bergemann v. Mutual Service Insurance Co. 270 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1978
Bauer v. Rummer, 244 Minn. 488 , Nebben v. Kosmalski, 307 Minn. 211 , Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co., Minn.
Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co. 259 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1977
Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co. 259 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1977
See, State v. Hoskins, 292 Minn. 111 , Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., 274 Minn. 482 , Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488
Nebben v. Kosmalski 239 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1976
Nebben v. Kosmalski 239 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1976
See, also, Gardner v. Germain, 264 Minn. 61, 117 , N. W. 2d 759 (1962); Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488
State v. Hoskins 193 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1972
State v. Hoskins 193 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1972
Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488 , Fortier v. Newman, 248 Minn. 69 , State v. Robinson, 262 Minn. 79 , , certiorari denied, 371 U. S. 815 , 83 S. Ct. 26 , 9 L. ed. 2d 56 (1962); Gardner v. Germain, 264 Minn. 61
Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas Company 191 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 1971
Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas Company 191 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 1971
1 See, e. g., Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. 274 Minn. 482 , Gardner v. Germain, 264 Minn. 61 , Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488 , State v. Gavle, 234 Minn. 186 , Collings v. Northwestern Hospital, 202 Minn. 139 , State v. Cater, 190 Minn. 485 , Brown v. Duluth, S. S. & A. Ry.
Stayberg v. Henderson 151 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1967
Stayberg v. Henderson 151 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1967
On authority of Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488, 490 , 70 N. W. (2d) 273, 275 , defendants assert that it is not proper to use affidavits from jurors in an attempt to impeach their verdict.
Gardner v. Germain 117 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1962
Gardner v. Germain 117 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1962
That problem arose in Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488, 490 , 70 N. W. (2d) 273, 275 , where we said: *66 “* * * It is the general rule that, after a jury has been discharged, no affidavit of a juror — and no affidavit of any other person relating to what a juror has said — will be received to impeach the verdict where the facts sought to be shown inhere in the verdict it
State v. Hayden Miller Co. 116 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1962
State v. Hayden Miller Co. 116 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1962
Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488 , 70 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Brown v. Duluth, S. S. & A. Ry.
Straus v. Straus 94 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1959
Straus v. Straus 94 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1959
1 See, Bauer v. Kummer, 244 Minn. 488 , 70 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Pierce v. Grand Army of the Republic, 220 Minn. 552 , 20 N. W. (2d) 489 ; Cullen v. City of Minneapolis, 201 Minn. 102 , .