DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Starkweather v. Blair, 71 N.W.2d 869.

64 citing documents.

  • Sylvestre v. State 214 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1973
  • Sylvestre v. State 214 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1973
    In the case of Starkweather v. Blair, 245 Minn. 371, 390 , we said: “It seems well established by our own decisions that, unless otherwise proscribed by the constitution, the power to create an office includes the power to destroy it or abolish it, and also to diminish the compensation for the office at the will of the legislature.
  • State v. Dugan 211 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Dugan 211 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1973
    This court in Starkweather v. Blair, 245 Minn. 371, 386 , with reference to Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U. S. (6 Cranch) 87, 138 , 3 L. ed. 162, 178 (1810), and Cummings v. State of Missouri, 71 U. S. (4 Wall.)
  • Driscoll v. Donovan 183 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1971
  • Driscoll v. Donovan 183 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1971
    Starkweather v. Blair, 245 Minn. 371, 390 , 71 N. W. (2d) 869, 881 .
  • Head v. Special School District No. 1 182 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1970
  • Head v. Special School District No. 1 182 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1970
    See, Starkweather v. Blair, 245 Minn. 371 , 71 N. W. (2d) 869 ; Slezak v. Ousdigian, 260 Minn. 303 , 110 N. W. (2d) 1 .
  • State v. Target Stores, Inc. 156 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Target Stores, Inc. 156 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1968
    See, also, Starkweather v. Blair, 245 Minn. 371, 379 , 71 N. W. (2d) 869, 875 .
  • Slezak v. Ousdigian 110 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1961
  • Slezak v. Ousdigian 110 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1961
    See, Starkweather v. Blair, 245 Minn. 371 , 71 N. W. (2d) 869 .
  • Knutson Hotel Corp. v. City of Moorhead 84 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1957
  • Knutson Hotel Corp. v. City of Moorhead 84 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1957
    In Starkweather v. *398 Blair, 245 Minn. 371, 395 , 71 N. W. (2d) 869, 884 , we stated: “* * * Ordinarily, where nothing can be accomplished by resort to administrative remedies, the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies does not apply.” See, also, Davis, Administrative Law, § 189.