Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation, 76 N.W.2d 107.

28 citing documents.

Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Coop v. County of Renville 737 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 2007
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Coop v. County of Renville 737 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 2007
6; see also Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. Comm’r of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6, 21 , (noting that “[i]f no appellant appears, the board must affirm” the order *558 made by the governmental unit below).
Matter of Linehan 557 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1996
Matter of Linehan 557 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1996
52.01; Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6, 23-24
United States Steel Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxation 226 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1975
United States Steel Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxation 226 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1975
of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6
Jaspersen v. Commissioner of Taxation 218 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1974
Jaspersen v. Commissioner of Taxation 218 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1974
of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6
Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 190 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1971
Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 190 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1971
of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6 , 76 N. W. (2d) 107 .
Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 145 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1966
Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 145 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1966
of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6 , 76 N. W. (2d) 107 ; Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Commr.
Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 138 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 1965
Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 138 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 1965
of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6 , 76 N. W. (2d) 107 ; Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Commr.
Skelly Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 131 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 1964
Skelly Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 131 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 1964
of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6, 10 , 76 N. W. (2d) 107 , 111: “* * * [I]n reviewing an order or determination of an administrative board, this court will go no further than to determine: (1) Whether the board kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether it proceeded on a correct theory of law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unrea
Great Northern Investments, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 127 N.W.2d 444 Minn. 1964
Great Northern Investments, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 127 N.W.2d 444 Minn. 1964
of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6 , 76 N. W. (2d) 107 .
Kearns v. Julette Originals Dress Co. 126 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1964
Kearns v. Julette Originals Dress Co. 126 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1964
of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6 , 76 N. W. (2d) 107 .
Vicker v. Starkey 122 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1963
Vicker v. Starkey 122 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1963
Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6 , 76 N. W. (2d) 107 .
Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 117 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1962
Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 117 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1962
of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6 , 76 N. W. (2d) 107 .
Sevcik v. Commissioner of Taxation 100 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1959
Sevcik v. Commissioner of Taxation 100 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1959
of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6 , 76 N. W. (2d) 107 .
Anderson v. Commissioner of Taxation 93 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1958
Anderson v. Commissioner of Taxation 93 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1958
of Taxation, 247 Minn. 6 , 76 N. W. (2d) 107 , we emphasized that our function as a court of review upon fact questions is to determine whether there is reasonable evidence to sustain the findings.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by