DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. DePauw, 74 N.W.2d 297.

33 citing documents.

  • State v. Wermerskirchen 497 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Wermerskirchen 497 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1993
    State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 492-93 , relying upon State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , and State v. Arradondo, 260 Minn. 512
  • State v. Haala 415 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Haala 415 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 493 , -71 (1965) (citing State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , ).
  • State v. Williams 239 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Williams 239 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1976
    State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491 , State v. Fitchette, 88 Minn. 145, 148 , State v. Schueller, 120 Minn. 26, 29 , State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91
  • State v. Saucedo 200 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Saucedo 200 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1972
    State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 [1955].” State v. Wofford, cited in the Sorg opinion, develops the particular exception relied upon by the state in the present case, noting at 262 Minn. 118 , , that— “* * * where two or more offenses are linked together in point of time or circumstances so that one cannot be full
  • State v. Martin 197 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Martin 197 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1972
    See, State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .” See, also, State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , *128 (1965); State v. Huffstutter, 269 Minn. 153 , State v. Currie, 267 Minn. 294
  • State v. Taylor 187 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Taylor 187 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1971
    State v. Klotter, 274 Minn. 58 , 142 N. W. (2d) 568 ; State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .
  • State v. Sorg 144 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Sorg 144 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1966
    State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .
  • State v. Klotter 142 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Klotter 142 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1966
    2 State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , 139 N. W. (2d) 167 ; State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .
  • State v. Spreigl 139 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Spreigl 139 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 1965
    It was not until our decision in State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 , that we squarely passed on the admissibility of prior sex offenses involving third persons.
  • State v. Sorenson 134 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Sorenson 134 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1965
    State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .
  • State v. Elli 125 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1964
  • State v. Elli 125 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1964
    It is settled law in this state that evidence of a separate crime may be admitted if it has “a reasonably close relation in scheme and pattern and in time to the act charged * * The determination * * * is in the first instance * * * largely within the discretion of the trial court.” State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91, 95 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297, 300 .
  • State v. Wofford 114 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 1962
  • State v. Wofford 114 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 1962
    See, State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .” It is well recognized that the rule excluding evidence of the commission of other offenses does not necessarily deprive the state of the right to make out its whole case against the accused on any evidence which is otherwise relevant upon the issue of the defendant’s guilt of the crime with whic
  • State v. Arradondo 110 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1961
  • State v. Arradondo 110 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1961
    As this court stated in State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91, 95 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 , 300: “* * * where we have a common pattern as disclosed by the evidence here, it would hardly do violence to the exception to the general rule to recognize that defendant had a purpose of abusing small children in his neighborhood while they were in his house.” Here the rule thus expressed wa
  • State v. Martineau 101 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1960
  • State v. Martineau 101 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1960
    State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 ; State v. Gavle, 234 Minn. 186 , 48 N. W. (2d) 44 .
  • State v. Finley 338 P.2d 790 Ariz. 1959
  • State v. Gress 84 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1957
  • State v. Gress 84 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1957
    See, State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .
  • State v. Connelly 82 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1957
  • State v. Connelly 82 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1957
    9 State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 ; State v. Monroe, 142 Minn. 394 , ; State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , 39 N. W. (2d) 887 ; City of St.