Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 80 N.W.2d 30.

60 citing documents.

Hill v. Gaertner 92 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1958
Hill v. Gaertner 92 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1958
5 Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240, 251 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30, 39 .
Flaherty v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. 87 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1958
Flaherty v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. 87 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1958
4 See, Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240, 250, 251 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30, 39 .
Lyon v. Dr. Scholl's Foot Comfort Shops, Inc. 87 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1958
Lyon v. Dr. Scholl's Foot Comfort Shops, Inc. 87 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1958
See, Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 .
Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
12 See, Hardy v. Anderson, 241 Minn. 478 , 63 N. W. (2d) 814 ; Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 .
Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. 79 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1956
Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. 79 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1956
In Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240, 244 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30, 36 , we recently said: “* * * the res ipsa loquitur rule has application only where the apparent cause of the accident is such that the defendant would be solely responsible for any negligence connected with it; and if an unexplained accident may reasonably be attributed to one or more causes