Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co., 77 N.W.2d 433.

50 citing documents.

W. J. A v. Patricia C. Johnson, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Terry M. Johnson, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Sherman v. Marden 525 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Sherman v. Marden 525 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Co., 247 Minn. 368, 375 , ) (citations omitted) (emphasis in original).
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Shaughnessy 519 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Myers v. Winslow R. Chamberlain Co. 443 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Myers v. Winslow R. Chamberlain Co. 443 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co., 247 Minn. 368, 375 , (to raise claim of misconduct, objection must be made at time of alleged misconduct or at close of argument taken down by reporter and before jury retires, as well as a request for corrective action and failure of court to act).
Kresko v. Rulli 432 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kresko v. Rulli 432 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Ellingson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 412 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ellingson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 412 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Patton v. Minneapolis *403 Street Railway Co., 247 Minn. 368, 376 , -9 (1956).
Quill v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Quill v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“A party is not permitted to remain silent, gamble on the outcome, and, having lost, then for the first time claim misconduct in opposing counsel’s argument.” Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway, 247 Minn. 368, 375
Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co. 258 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1977
Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co. 258 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1977
Co., 247 Minn. 368 , Janicke v. Hilltop Farm Feed Co., 235 Minn. 135
Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
Wild v. Rarig 234 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1975
Wild v. Rarig 234 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1975
Co. 247 Minn. 368, 375 , , 58 A. L. R. 2d 921, 929 (1956), where this court stated: “Unless the misconduct is so flagrant as to require the trial court to act on its own motion [See, Magistad v. Potter, 277 Minn. 570 , Janicke v. Hilltop Farm Feed Co. 235 Minn. 135 , ]
Janssen v. Neal 223 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1974
Janssen v. Neal 223 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1974
Co. 247 Minn. 368 , , 58 A. L. R. 2d 921 (1956).
Dean v. Weisbrod 217 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1974
Dean v. Weisbrod 217 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1974
State v. Gilreath 487 P.2d 385 Ariz. 1971
Kramer v. Kramer 162 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1968
Kramer v. Kramer 162 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1968
Co. 247 Minn. 368 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433 , 58 A. L. R. (2d) 921; 14 Dunnell, Dig.
Lamont v. INDEPENDENT SCH. D. NO. 395 OF WATERVILLE 154 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1967
Lamont v. INDEPENDENT SCH. D. NO. 395 OF WATERVILLE 154 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1967
Co. 247 Minn. 368, 378 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433, 440 , 58 A. L. R. (2d) 921 (dissenting opinion).
Colgan v. Raymond 146 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1966
Colgan v. Raymond 146 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1966
Co. 247 Minn. 368 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433 , 58 A. L. R. (2d) 921; Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc. 238 Minn. 322 , 56 N. W. (2d) 655 ; 14 Dunnell, Dig.
Staloch v. Belsaas 136 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1965
Staloch v. Belsaas 136 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1965
Co. 247 Minn. 368, 370 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433, 435 , 58 A. L. R. (2d) 921, this court stated: “While it is true that an adult passenger on a bus or streetcar ceases to be such after he alights therefrom, the carrier’s duty of exercising for him the degree of care required of it for its passengers continues thereafter until he has had reas
Grossman v. Wolkowitz 132 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1965
Grossman v. Wolkowitz 132 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1965
Co. 247 Minn. 368 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433, 58 .
Pautz v. American Insurance Co. 128 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1964
Pautz v. American Insurance Co. 128 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1964
Co. 247 Minn. 368 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433 , 58 A. L. R. (2d) 921, unless such statements were so flagrant and reprehensible that the court should have acted thereon upon its own motion.
Hammersten v. Reiling 115 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1962
Hammersten v. Reiling 115 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1962
Co. 247 Minn. 368 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433 , 58 A. L. R. (2d) 921; Beebe v. Kleidon, 242 Minn. 521 , 65 N. W. (2d) 614 ; Hardy v. Anderson, 241 Minn. 478 , 63 N. W. (2d) 814 ; State v. Becker, 231 Minn. 174 , 42 N. W. (2d) 704 ; Brecht v. Town of Bergen, 182 Minn. 603 , .
Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
Co. 247 Minn. 368 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433 , 58 A. L. R. (2d) *141 921.
Nieman v. Jacobs 347 P.2d 702 Ariz. 1959
Pelzer v. Lange 93 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1958
Pelzer v. Lange 93 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1958
Co. 247 Minn. 368 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433 , 58 A. L. R. (2d) 921, unless such statements were so flagrant and reprehensible that the court should have acted thereon upon its own motion.
Bush v. Havir 91 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1958
Bush v. Havir 91 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1958
Co. 247 Minn. 368, 376 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433, 438 , 58 A. L. R. (2d) 921, 930: “* * * it would have been better, of course, if some of the remarks had not been made but it seems fair to assume that they did not influence the jury.
Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
Co. 247 Minn. 368 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433 ; Hallada v. G. N. Ry.
Lee v. Lee 80 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1957
Lee v. Lee 80 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1957
Co. 247 Minn. 368 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433 ; Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276, 282 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561, 565 ; Hardy v. Anderson, 241 Minn. 478, 483 , 63 N. W. (2d) 814, 818 ; Smith v. Barry, 219 Minn. 182, 191 , 17 N. W. (2d) 324, 328 .
Fieve v. Emmeck 78 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1956
Fieve v. Emmeck 78 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1956
Co. 247 Minn. 368 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433 ; Hardy v. Anderson, 241 Minn. 478 , 63 N. W. (2d) 814 ; 14 Dunnell, Dig.