Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wichelman v. Messner, 83 N.W.2d 800.

123 citing documents.

Izaak Walton League of America Endowment, Inc. v. State 252 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1977
See, Saranac Land, & c., Co. v. Comptroller of N. Y. 177 U. S. 318 , 20 S. Ct. 642 , 44 L. ed. 786 (1900); Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88
Township of Sterling v. Griffin 244 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1976
Township of Sterling v. Griffin 244 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1976
In Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88, 103 , we suggested that unregistered right-of-way easements are subject to extinguishment unless brought within the protection of the possession exception, and we have so applied the act in subsequent decisions, Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164 , United
Peterson v. Haule 230 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1975
Peterson v. Haule 230 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1975
Co. 257 Minn. 171 , Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88
State, Department of Public Safety v. Kaasa 196 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1972
State, Department of Public Safety v. Kaasa 196 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1972
Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88, 118
Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88 , 83 N. W. (2d) 800 , 71 A. L. R. (2d) 816.
State v. Target Stores, Inc. 156 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1968
State v. Target Stores, Inc. 156 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1968
no such implication of limited repeal for two additional reasons: First, the vagueness we have found in the classification of restricted commodities would render equally vague the resulting area of unrestricted commodities and, hence, the extent of even such “irreconcilable conflict.” An act will be declared void on the ground of vagueness and uncertainty, as we indicated in Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88, 111 , 83 N. W. (2d) 800, 819 , 71 A. L. R. (2d) 816, if it is “so imperfect and defici
Witzig v. Philips 144 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1966
Witzig v. Philips 144 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1966
Whether or not § 541.023, which was construed by this court in Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88 , 83 N. W. (2d) 800 , 71 A. L. R. (2d) 816, applies to this case will depend upon the evidence produced if and when the case is retried.
CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. Tapper 143 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1966
CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. Tapper 143 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1966
It cannot be equivocal or ambiguous but must be of a character which would put a prudent person on inquiry.” See, also, Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88 , 83 N. W. (2d) 800 , 71 A. L. R. (2d) 816, for a complete discussion of the Marketable Title Act.
Agassiz & Odessa Mutual Fire Insurance v. Magnusson 136 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1965
Agassiz & Odessa Mutual Fire Insurance v. Magnusson 136 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1965
imply that the legislature intended to impose unreasonable burdens and restrictions on township mutual fire insurance companies in the absence of any need or requirement therefor and would require us to disregard the statutory presumption expressed in § 645.17(1) that “[t]he legislature does not intend a result that is absurd, impossible of execution, or unreasonable.” See, Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88 , 83 N. W. (2d) 800 , 71 A. L. R. (2d) 816; In re Order of Superintendent of *168 School
Besch v. Village of Arden Hills 115 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1962
Besch v. Village of Arden Hills 115 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1962
§§ 645.16, 645.17; Erickson v. Sunset Memorial Park Assn. Inc. 259 Minn. 532 , 108 N. W. (2d) 434 ; Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88 , 83 N. W. (2d) 800 , 71 A. L. R. (2d) 816.
United Parking Stations, Inc. v. Calvary Temple 101 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1960
United Parking Stations, Inc. v. Calvary Temple 101 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1960
In Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88, 103 , 83 N. W. (2d) 800, 814 , we said: “* * * The statute provides (§ 541.023, subd.
Grushus v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 100 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1960
Grushus v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 100 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1960
Wichelman v. *175 Messner, 250 Minn. 88 , 83 N. W. (2d) 800 ; 17 Dunnell, Dig.