Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite HP Droher & Sons v. Toushin, 85 N.W.2d 273.

35 citing documents.

Sustainable 9, LLC d/b/a Sustainable 9 Design + Build, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Droher & (stating that whether a contractor properly performed on its contract is a question of fact).
Joey Gunderson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Droher & -79 (Minn. 1957) (performance).
David Schindele, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Droher & see also Johnson, d at 87 (stating that “the lack of foundation .
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Michael Gavigan, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Joseph 636 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 2001
State v. Joseph 636 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 2001
Droher & Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490 , we stated, “Ordinarily, when a litigant is willing to gamble on the outcome of a lawsuit and sit silent when he has an opportunity to present evidence, he should be bound by the result, whatever it may be.” Id.
Rands v. Forest Lake Lumber Mart, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rands v. Forest Lake Lumber Mart, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Droher and Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490, 499
Fudally v. Ching Johnson Builders, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Fudally v. Ching Johnson Builders, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Droher and Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490, 499
Elk River Enterprises, Inc. v. Adams 357 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Elk River Enterprises, Inc. v. Adams 357 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Droher and Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490, 502 , see also Frame v. Hohrman, 229 Minn. 468
Julian Johnson Construction Corp. v. Parranto 352 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Julian Johnson Construction Corp. v. Parranto 352 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Droher & Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490, 494
Vreeman v. Davis 348 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1984
Vreeman v. Davis 348 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1984
Droher & Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490, 501 , we found the owner’s opinion, “standing alone,” to be of little probative value in the absence of any showing that the owner was familiar with the market value of similar property.
City of Eveleth v. Ruble 225 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1974
City of Eveleth v. Ruble 225 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1974
nable cost of $17,452.00, plus contractor overhead and profit (20%) in the amount of $3,490.40, and engineering and inspection (15%) in the amount of $2,617.80, for a total of $23,560.20.” The memorandum made part of the order for judgment reads, in part: “The measure of damages in a case against an engineer appears to be patterned after the rule set down in H. P. Droher and *261 Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490 , .
Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. 211 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1973
Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. 211 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1973
Marshall v. Marvin H. Anderson Const. Co. 283 Minn. 320 , H. P. Droher & Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490 , Restatement, Contracts, § 346.
Jackson v. Buesgens 186 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1971
Jackson v. Buesgens 186 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1971
Under such circumstances, as far as the real estate is concerned, the rule we applied in H. P. Droher & Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490 , 85 N. W. (2d) 273 , restricts recovery to the cost of repairing the defects, plus a reasonable amount for the loss of use of the basement and damage to personal property.
Marshall v. Marvin H. Anderson Construction Co. 167 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1969
Marshall v. Marvin H. Anderson Construction Co. 167 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1969
Defendant cites only one case which it claims to be controlling —H. P. Droher & Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490 , 85 N. W. (2d) 273 .
Breza v. Thaldorf 149 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1967
Breza v. Thaldorf 149 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1967
4 H. P. Droher & Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490 , 85 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Independent School Dist.
Crea v. Hall 122 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1963
Crea v. Hall 122 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1963
Authorities cited by plaintiff include Podgorski v. Kerwin, 147 Minn. 103 , ; Amland v. Grose, 208 Minn. 596 , ; Parrish v. Peoples, 214 Minn. 589 , 9 N. W. (2d) 225 ; In re Estate of Liberopulos, 245 Minn. 553 , 73 N. W. (2d) 607 ; and H. P. Droher & Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490 , 85 N. W. (2d) 273 .
Prodger v. Zell 113 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1962
Prodger v. Zell 113 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1962
For a discussion of the measure of damages in a breach of contract, see H. P. Droher & Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490 , 85 N. W. (2d) 273 .
Fussner v. Andert 113 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1961
Housing and Redevelopment Authority v. Zweigbaum 100 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1960
Housing and Redevelopment Authority v. Zweigbaum 100 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1960
H. P. Droher & Sons v. Toushin, 250 Minn. 490 , 85 N. W. (2d) 273 .