DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Illinois Ex Rel. Shannon v. Sterling, 80 N.W.2d 13.

28 citing documents.

  • Douglas County Child Support Enforcement Unit v. Cavegn 420 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Marriage of Krogstad v. Krogstad 388 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Marriage of Krogstad v. Krogstad 388 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , ] and conclude that the county attorney may represent custodial parents as to visitation matters that arise in conjunction with the enforcement of support obligations.
  • State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland 361 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1985
  • State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland 361 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1985
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266
  • England v. England 337 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1983
  • England v. England 337 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1983
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266, 270 , (construing the predecessor to ch. 518C, Minn.Stat.
  • St. George v. St. George 304 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1981
  • St. George v. St. George 304 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1981
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , when this court determined that a county attorney could, on behalf of a party entitled to support payments, apply to the court for a modification of the obligor’s visitation rights to the extent necessary to enforce a future duty of support.
  • City of Hutchinson v. Otto 235 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1975
  • City of Hutchinson v. Otto 235 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1975
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , Albert v. Edgewater Beach Bldg.
  • Ryan v. Ryan 219 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1974
  • Ryan v. Ryan 219 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1974
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , Gannon v. Gannon, 258 Minn. 57 , Michalson v. Michalson, 263 Minn. 356 , Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , Smith v. Smith, 282 Minn. 190
  • Smith v. Smith 163 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1968
  • Smith v. Smith 163 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1968
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , 80 N. W. (2d) 13 ; Iverson v. Iverson, 243 Minn. 54 , 66 N. W. (2d) 549 ; Hasse v. Hasse, 232 Minn. 234 , 45 N. W. (2d) 383 .
  • Fish v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1968
  • Fish v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1968
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , 80 N. W. (2d) 13 .
  • Curry v. Felix 149 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1967
  • Curry v. Felix 149 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1967
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266, 274 , 80 N. W. (2d) 13, 19 , a leading case construing the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act.
  • Zaine v. Zaine 120 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1963
  • Zaine v. Zaine 120 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1963
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , 80 N. W. (2d) 13 ; Atwood v. Atwood, 253 Minn. 185 , 91 N. W. (2d) 728 ; Wicklem v. Wicklem, 229 Minn. 478 , 40 N. W. (2d) 69 ; Mund v. Mund, 252 Minn. 442 , 90 N. W. (2d) 309 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881 .
  • Michalson v. Michalson 116 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1962
  • Michalson v. Michalson 116 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1962
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , 80 N. W. (2d) 13 ; Hasse v. Hasse, 232 Minn. 234 , 45 N. W. (2d) 383 ; Eberhart v. Eberhart, supra 1 These authorities have valid application under circumstances where the wife by wrongful or malicious conduct deprives the husband of his right of visitation, or where the husband is not informed of the removal or the
  • Gannon v. Gannon 102 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1960
  • Gannon v. Gannon 102 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1960
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , 80 N. W. (2d) 13 , where a husband may be relieved from payment of support money because the wife having custody of the child removed to a distant state without the court’s approval or without the husband’s consent, which removal frustrated the husband’s right of visitation.
  • Holmes v. Holmes 91 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1958
  • Holmes v. Holmes 91 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1958
    Shannon v. Sterling, 248 Minn. 266 , 80 N. W. (2d) 13 .
  • Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955