Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Larson v. Anchor Casualty Co., 82 N.W.2d 376.

25 citing documents.

James A. Hoffman, M.D., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co. , d 376, 383 (Minn. 1957).
Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 819 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2012
Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 819 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2012
Co., 249 Minn. 339, 349-50
Columbia Casualty Co. v. 3M Co. 814 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Columbia Casualty Co. v. 3M Co. 814 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Co., 249 Minn. 339, 349-50 , (“[I]t is the duty of the insurance.
Northfield Insurance Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co. 545 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Northfield Insurance Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co. 545 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Larson v. Anchor Casualty Co., 249 Minn. 339, 350 , (quoting Frank B. Connet Lumber Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 236 F.2d 117, 127 (8th Cir.1956)).
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 448 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1989
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 448 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1989
Co., 249 Minn. 339, 353 , and this guideline has been set for the governance of the conduct of insurer and insured under circumstances like those encountered in the present case: Where a claim is made against an insured which may exceed policy limits, and where the insured and insurer may each incur liability
Short v. Dairyland Insurance Co. 334 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1983
Short v. Dairyland Insurance Co. 334 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1983
Lange v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 290 Minn. 61 , Larson v. Anchor Casualty Co., 249 Minn. 339
Continental Casualty Co. v. Reserve Insurance 238 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1976
Continental Casualty Co. v. Reserve Insurance 238 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1976
Co. 249 Minn. 339 , Boerger v. American Gen.
New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. Lundquist 198 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1972
New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. Lundquist 198 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1972
Co. 249 Minn. 339, 352 , 9B Dunnell, Dig.
Lange v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York 185 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1971
Lange v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York 185 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1971
Co. 249 Minn. 339, 340 , 82 N. W. (2d) 376, 378 , “there must be bad faith on the part of the insurer with resulting *65 injury to the insured before there can be a cause of action against the insurer for the excess over its undertaking.” Recently, In Herges v. Western Cas.
Transport Indemnity Co. v. Dahlen Transport, Inc. 161 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1968
Transport Indemnity Co. v. Dahlen Transport, Inc. 161 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1968
Co. 249 Minn. 339 , 82 N. W. (2d) 376 ; Lawson & Nelson Co. v. Associated Ind.
Peterson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 160 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1968
Peterson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 160 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1968
Co. 249 Minn. 339, 355 , 82 N. W. (2d) 376, 386 ; Boerger v. American General Ins.
Bratnober v. Rowell, Inc. 123 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1963
Bratnober v. Rowell, Inc. 123 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1963
Co. 249 Minn. 339, 355 , 82 N. W. (2d) 376 , 386: “* * * It is clear that Minnesota has adopted the rule that a liability insurer, having assumed control of the right of settlement of claims against the insured, may become liable in excess of its undertaking under the policy provisions if it fails to exercise ‘good faith’ in considerin
Boerger v. American General Insurance Co. 100 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1959
Boerger v. American General Insurance Co. 100 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1959
Co. 249 Minn. 339, 340 , 82 N. W. (2d) 376, 378 , where we stated the rule as follows: “The rule in this state is that a liability insurer, having assumed control of the right of settlement of claims against the insured under a policy which gives it the exclusive right to defend and settle, may become liable in excess of its undertakin