Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co., 83 N.W.2d 409.

84 citing documents.

Medcenters Health Care, Inc. v. Park NicolletCenter 430 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Medcenters Health Care, Inc. v. Park NicolletCenter 430 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“The general rule is that ‘an arbitrator, in the absence of any agreement limiting his authority, is the final judge of both law and fact.’ ” State by Sundquist v. Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union Local No. 320, (quoting Co urnoyer v. American Television and Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577, 580 , ).
Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 426 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1988
Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 426 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1988
Cournoyer v. American Television and Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577, 580 , -12 (1957).
E.D.S. Construction Co. v. North End Health Center, Inc. 412 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
E.D.S. Construction Co. v. North End Health Center, Inc. 412 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Absent an agreement limiting his authority, an arbitrator “is the final judge of both law and fact, including the interpretation of the terms of any contract * * Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577, 580 , pet.
Lucas v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 403 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1987
Lucas v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 403 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1987
& Law Enforcement Employee’s Union Local 320, Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577, 580
Koranda v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. 397 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Koranda v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. 397 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cournoyer v. American Television and Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577, 580 , (footnotes omitted) (emphasis supplied).
David A. Brooks Enterprises, Inc. v. First Systems Agencies 370 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
David A. Brooks Enterprises, Inc. v. First Systems Agencies 370 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577, 579
Kostrzewski v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. 364 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kostrzewski v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. 364 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
at 544 , quoting Cournoyer v. American Television and Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577, 580
Duluth Federation of Teachers, Local 692 v. Independent School District No. 709 361 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1985
State Ex Rel. Sundquist v. Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union Local No. 320 316 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1982
State Ex Rel. Sundquist v. Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union Local No. 320 316 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1982
The general rule is that “an arbitrator, in the absence of any agreement limiting his authority, is the final judge of both law and fact.” Cournoyer v. American Television and Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577, 580
Children's Hospital, Inc. v. Minnesota Nurses Ass'n 265 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1978
Children's Hospital, Inc. v. Minnesota Nurses Ass'n 265 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1978
No. 77, Minn., Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577, 580
State v. Berthiaume 259 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1977
State v. Berthiaume 259 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1977
For, unlike the issue of arbitrability, with respect to the issue of the merits of the dispute it is well settled that “an arbitrator, in the absence of any agreement limiting his authority, is the final judge of both law and fact, including the interpretation of the terms of any contract.” Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577, 580 , Fischer v. Guaranteed Concrete Co., 276 Minn. 510 , 2 Dunnell, Dig.
Eric A. Carlstrom Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 77 256 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1977
Eric A. Carlstrom Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 77 256 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1977
In Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577 , we held that an arbitrator, in the absence of an agreement limiting his authority, is the final judge of both law and fact, including the interpretation of the terms of any contract, unless there is fraud, mistake in applying his own theory, misconduct, or disregard of duty.
INTERN. U. OF E. & M. WKRS. v. Portec, Inc. 228 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1975
International Union of Electrical & Machine Workers, Local No.1140 v. Portec, Inc. 228 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1975
INTERN. U. OF E. & M. WKRS. v. Portec, Inc. 228 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1975
Co., 296 Minn. 195 , Fischer v. Guaranteed Concrete Co., 276 Minn. 510 , Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284 , Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co., 249 Minn. 577
International Union of Electrical & Machine Workers, Local No.1140 v. Portec, Inc. 228 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1975
Co. 296 Minn. 195 , Fischer v. Guaranteed Concrete Co. 276 *345 Minn. 510 , Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 266 Minn. 284 , Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co. 249 Minn. 577
Grudem Brothers Co. v. Great Western Piping Corp. 213 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1973
Grudem Brothers Co. v. Great Western Piping Corp. 213 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1973
Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co. 249 Minn. 577, 580
Ehlert Ex Rel. Ehlert v. Western National Mutual Insurance 207 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1973
Ehlert Ex Rel. Ehlert v. Western National Mutual Insurance 207 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1973
In Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co. 249 Minn. 577, 580 , we said: “* * * [I]t is well to bear in mind the general rule that an arbitrator, in the absence of any agreement limiting his authority, is the final judge of both law and fact, including the interpretation of the terms of any contract, and his award will not be reviewed or set asi
Schmidt v. Beninga 173 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1970
Fischer v. Guaranteed Concrete Co. 151 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1967
Fischer v. Guaranteed Concrete Co. 151 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1967
In Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co. 249 Minn. 577 , 83 N. W. (2d) 409 , we said that, in passing on the issue of whether the award of an arbitrator may be set aside as invalid because of alleged misinterpretation of controlling contract provisions, the general rule is that an arbitrator, in the absence of any agreement limiting his authority, is the final judge of bo