Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ewing, 84 N.W.2d 904.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1(1) (emphasis added); d 904, 909 (Minn. 1957) (“In order to warrant a conviction, the state is required to establish by proof beyond a reasonable doubt all of the essential elements of the crime with which the defendant is charged in the indictment.”).
- State v. Beecroft 813 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2012
-
State v. Beecroft
813 N.W.2d 814
Minn. 2012
See State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436, 442 , -10 (1957).
- State v. Sahr 812 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2012
- State v. Al-Naseer 788 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 2010
-
State v. Al-Naseer
788 N.W.2d 469
Minn. 2010
); (stating that, “[c]onsidering the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict and the totality of the circumstances, the jury could reasonably conclude that the only plausible inference to be drawn was that appellant intended to commit a sex crime against Lott”); State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436, 443 , (stating that the circumstances proved “were all consistent with the hypothesis of guilt and inconsistent with the theory of the defendant that the victim may have been the driver of the car
- State v. Al-Naseer 690 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 2005
-
State v. Al-Naseer
690 N.W.2d 744
Minn. 2005
See State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436, 445-46 , -12 (1957).
- State v. Papadakis 643 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
State v. Papadakis
643 N.W.2d 349
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436, 441
- State v. Pelawa 590 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State v. Pelawa
590 N.W.2d 142
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Appellant relies on State v. Brehrner, 281 Minn. 156 , and State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436 , (both finding gross negligence when the driver was intoxicated), to argue that because he was not intoxicated, he cannot be convicted of gross negligence.
- State v. Robinson 517 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1994
-
State v. Robinson
517 N.W.2d 336
Minn. 1994
E.g., State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436, 442
- State v. Lund 474 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
State v. Lund
474 N.W.2d 169
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
t I impartly [sic] , decided February 24, 1987, specifically Page 129, where the court, speaking through Judge Nierengarten of the Court of Appeals said: “Even if a seatbelt would have prevented Quarnstrom’s death, any negligence on her part is relevant only if it constituted a superseding intervening cause of the accident.” And they quote State v. Ewing, [ 250 Minn. 436, 444-45 ,] [ (Minn.1957) ].
- State v. Miller 471 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
State v. Miller
471 N.W.2d 380
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See State v. Brehmer, 281 Minn. 156, 161 , (drinking plus driving at an extreme rate of speed); State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436, 438-39, 443 , 912 (1957) (excessive drinking combined with reckless driving).
- State v. Iten 401 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Iten
401 N.W.2d 127
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436, 444-45
- State v. Paige 256 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1977
-
State v. Paige
256 N.W.2d 298
Minn. 1977
While it is true that the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense charged, see, e. g., State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436 , there may be circumstances in which the defendant has the burden of proof.
- State v. Peterson 123 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1963
-
State v. Peterson
123 N.W.2d 177
Minn. 1963
2 State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436 , 84 N. W. (2d) 904 ; State v. Kaster, 211 Minn. 119 , ; State v. Johnson, 173 Minn. 543 , .
- State v. Bell 115 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1962
-
State v. Bell
115 N.W.2d 468
Minn. 1962
But within these limits any degree of proof upon which as reasonable men they would act in matters of great importance to themselves would be sufficient.” In State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436 , 84 N. W. (2d) 904 , we pointed out that where the evidence is circumstantial the weight of such evidence is a question for the jury to determine.
- State v. Meany 115 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1962
-
State v. Meany
115 N.W.2d 247
Minn. 1962
6 State v. Cook, 212 Minn. 495 , 4 N. W. (2d) 323 ; State v. Clow, 215 Minn. 380 , 10 N. W. (2d) 359 ; State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 ; State v. Homme, 226 Minn. 83 , 32 N. W. (2d) 151 ; State v. Brady, 244 Minn. 455 , 70 N. W. (2d) 449 ; State v. Anderson, 247 Minn. 469 , 78 N. W. (2d) 320 ; State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436 , 84 N. W. (2d) 904 .
- Risnes v. Stonebreaker 110 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1961
-
Risnes v. Stonebreaker
110 N.W.2d 475
Minn. 1961
In State v. Ewing, 250 Minn. 436 , 84 N. W. (2d) 904 , the evidence disclosed that the owner of the car had turned it over to defendant shortly before the accident; that while at a tavern defendant boasted about the *73 speed of the car he had then been driving; and that after the accident he was found in the driver’s seat with his head and body exte