DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Johnson, 84 N.W.2d 249.

35 citing documents.

  • Roanaq Osman, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
  • Minn. 2021
    [and we] do not, or should not, sally forth each day looking for wrongs to right.” (citation omitted)); (“It is not within the province of this court to determine issues of fact .
  • Minn. 2020
    P. 52.01 (instructing that “[f] indings of fact, whet her based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses”); (“ It is not within the province of this court to determine issues of fact.
  • James Michael Olsen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    See Johnson v. Johnson , 250 Minn. 282, 288, (“It is not within the province of this court to determine issues of fact .
  • Lapoint v. Orthodontics 892 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 2017
  • Lapoint v. Orthodontics 892 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 2017
    The result in Hasnudeen is consistent with our recognition that the proper standard of review “does not permit us to engage in fact-finding anew.” (citing Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282, 288 , (“It is not within the province of this court to determine issues of fact....
  • Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co. 832 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2013
  • Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co. 832 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2013
    See Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282, 288 , (“It is not within the province of this court to determine issues of fact....
  • Redleaf v. Redleaf 807 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
  • Redleaf v. Redleaf 807 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
    Appellant cites Johnson v. Johnson, a 1957 Minnesota Supreme Court case, for the proposition that the district court’s discretion to divide marital assets “reasonably embraces the fixing of an equitable interest rate where interest is due, and the exercise of that discretion is not controlled by statutory or legal interest rates applicable to other cases.” 250 Minn. 282, 292
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Levinson 438 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Levinson 438 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282
  • In Re the Marriage of Braun v. Braun 350 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • In Re the Marriage of Braun v. Braun 350 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282
  • Cockrill v. Cockrill 676 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • Ronnkvist v. Ronnkvist 331 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1983
  • Ronnkvist v. Ronnkvist 331 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1983
    Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282, 292
  • Hedberg & Sons Co. v. County of Hennepin 232 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1975
  • Hedberg & Sons Co. v. County of Hennepin 232 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1975
    Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282 , I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co. 94 Minn. 331
  • Hoffman v. Hoffman 227 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1975
  • Hoffman v. Hoffman 227 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1975
    Kucera v. Kucera, 275 Minn. 252 , Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282 , Holmes v. Holmes, 255 Minn. 270
  • General Mills, Inc. v. State 226 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1975
  • General Mills, Inc. v. State 226 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1975
    Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282 , I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co. 94 Minn. 831
  • Bollenbach v. Bollenbach 175 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1970
  • Bollenbach v. Bollenbach 175 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1970
    See, Peterson v. Peterson, 274 Minn. 568 , 144 N. W. (2d) 597 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282 , 84 N. W. (2d) 249 .
  • Vandewege v. Vandewege 170 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1969
  • Vandewege v. Vandewege 170 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1969
    Haskell v. Haskell, 119 Minn. 484 , ; Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282, 288 , 84 N. W. (2d) 249, 254 ; Kucera v. Kucera, 275 Minn. 252 , 146 N. W. (2d) 181 ; Johnston v. Johnston, 280 Minn. 81 , 158 N. W. (2d) 249 .
  • Gallivan v. Gallivan 155 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1967
  • Gallivan v. Gallivan 155 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1967
    See, also, Hellman v. Hellman, 250 Minn. 422 , 84 N. W. (2d) 367 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282 , 84 N. W. (2d) 249 ; Druck v. Druck, 258 Minn. 114 , 103 N. W. (2d) 123 ; Stephenson v. Stephenson, 258 Minn. 435 , 104 N. W. (2d) 517 ; Cloutier v. Cloutier, 261 Minn. 324 , 112 N. W. (2d) 347 .
  • Ehlmann v. Ehlmann 154 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1967
  • Ehlmann v. Ehlmann 154 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1967
    In Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282, 288 , 84 N. W. (2d) 249, 254 , we stated: “* * * It is not within the province of this court to determine issues of fact, and an award of alimony and support money and an adjudication of property rights will be overturned on appeal only when, in the light of the evidence as a whole, the trial court has abused this di
  • Silverness v. Silverness 134 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1965
  • Silverness v. Silverness 134 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1965
    See, Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282 , 84 N. W. (2d) 249 ; Baskerville v. Baskerville, 246 Minn. 496 , 75 N. W. (2d) 762 ; Krusemark v. Krusemark, 232 Minn. 416 , 46 N. W. (2d) 647 ; Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 .
  • Ruprecht v. Ruprecht 96 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1959
  • Ruprecht v. Ruprecht 96 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1959
    Eck v. Eck, 252 Minn. 290 , 90 N. W. (2d) 211 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282 , 84 N. W. (2d) 249 ; Hellman v. Hellman, 250 Minn. *91 422, 84 N. W. (2d) 367 ; Baskerville v. Baskerville, 246 Minn. 496 , 75 N. W. (2d) 762 ; Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 ; Krusemark v. Krusemark, 232 Minn. 416 , 46 N. W. (2d) 647 ; Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 ; 6 Dunn