Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America, 89 N.W.2d 412.

40 citing documents.

Mickman Bros., Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 639 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mickman Bros., Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 639 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., 252 Minn. 86 , (same).
More Clinic v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 575 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
More Clinic v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 575 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Co. of North America, 252 Minn. 86, 92-93 , -18 (1958) (injuiy to bystander caused by negligently driven truck arose out of use of motor vehicle, but injury also caused by negligent placement of turntable upon which truck was driven).
North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Raincloud 563 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Raincloud 563 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., 252 Minn. 86, 93 , (concluding that “use” of motor vehicle includes exercise of supervisory control over its movements).
Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 523 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1994
Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 523 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1994
Kolby v. Northwest Produce Co., Inc. 505 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Kolby v. Northwest Produce Co., Inc. 505 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., 252 Minn. 86, 93 , (use of a motor vehicle includes exercise of supervisory control over vehicle’s movement).
Retail Systems, Inc. v. CNA Insurance Companies 469 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Retail Systems, Inc. v. CNA Insurance Companies 469 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Co., 252 Minn. 86 , is misplaced.
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Selisker 435 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Selisker 435 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co., 252 Minn. 86 , the Minnesota Supreme Court allowed coverage under both automobile and general business liability insurance policies when a dump truck, on a negligently located turntable, rolled over a person as a result of negligent signaling.
Ed Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Transit Casualty Co. 402 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ed Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Transit Casualty Co. 402 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The trial court based its determination that Kraemer was an omnibus insured on Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co., 252 Minn. 86
Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Noska 331 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1983
Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Noska 331 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1983
Co., 252 Minn. 86 , Woodrich, a general contracting firm, and its general business liability insurer had satisfied a judgment against Woodrich, and were seeking contribution from Woodrich’s automobile liability insurer (and two other insurers).
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. 284 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1979
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. 284 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1979
In Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co., 252 Minn. 86 , we said it was immaterial for insurance purposes whether or not a general contractor’s liability arose from ac *184 tual use of a truck.
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Northstar Mutual Insurance Co. 281 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1979
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Northstar Mutual Insurance Co. 281 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1979
Co. of North America, 252 Minn. 86 , Commercial Cas.
Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance 239 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
Integrity Mut. Ins. v. S. AUTO. & CAS., ETC. 239 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
Integrity Mut. Ins. v. S. AUTO. & CAS., ETC. 239 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
Co. of North America, 252 Minn. 86 , Commercial Cas.
Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance 239 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
Co. of North America, 252 Minn. 86 , Commercial Cas.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co. 490 P.2d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Sathre v. Brewer 184 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1971
Sathre v. Brewer 184 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1971
Co. 252 Minn. 86, 98 , 89 N. W. (2d) 412, 420 , we rejected any “arbitrary rule or circumstance” for determining respective liabilities in the situation of overlapping insurance coverage, and this was reiterated in Olson v. The Hertz Corp. 270 Minn. 223, 227 , 133 N. W. (2d) 519, 523 .
Dukeman v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 174 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1970
Dukeman v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 174 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1970
Co. 252 Minn. 86 , 89 N. W. (2d) 412 ; Celina Mutual Cas.
Federal Insurance Company v. Prestemon 153 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1967
Federal Insurance Company v. Prestemon 153 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1967
Co. 252 Minn. 86 , 89 N. W. (2d) 412 ; Annotation, 46 A. L. R. (2d) 1165; 7 Am.
Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. Universal Underwriters Insurance 150 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1967
Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. Universal Underwriters Insurance 150 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1967
Co. 252 Minn. 86 , 89 N. W. (2d) 412 ; 7 Am.
Nicollet Properties, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance 135 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1965
Nicollet Properties, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance 135 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1965
Co. 252 Minn. 86 , 89 N. W. (2d) 412 ; Liberty Mutual Ins.
Olson v. Hertz Corporation 133 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1965
Olson v. Hertz Corporation 133 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1965
Co. 252 Minn. 86 , 89 N. W. (2d) 412 , as controlling.
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Hamman Wholesale Lumber & Supply Co. 390 P.2d 897 Ariz. 1964

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by