Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 95 N.W.2d 657.

64 citing documents.

Doe A.S., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc., … Minn. 2026
Alvin Glay, trustee for the next of kin of Unity McGill, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. R.C. of St. Cloud, Inc., … Minn. 2026
( (concluding that a hotel serving intoxicating beverages owed a duty to protect a person walking on a public sidewalk adjacent to the hotel from the consequences of dangerous conduct by the hotel’s guests, who released objects from hotel windows)).
Court of Appeals Hudson, J. Dissenting as to Part I, Anderson, J., David Smits, as Trustee for the … Minn. 2022
Warren v. Dinter 926 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2019
Warren v. Dinter 926 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2019
Molloy II , d at 719 (quoting Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel , 254 Minn. 373 , , 664 (1959) (quoting Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R.
Fenrich v. Blake Sch. 920 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2018
Fenrich v. Blake Sch. 920 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2018
" (quoting Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel , 254 Minn. 373 , , 664 (1959) ) ).
Fenrich v. Blake School 901 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Fenrich v. Blake School 901 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The test is not whether the precise nature and manner of the plaintiffs injury was foreseeable, but whether ‘the possibility of an accident was clear to the person of ordinary prudence.’” Domagala, d at 27 (quoting Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 382 , ).
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc. 898 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc. 898 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
(quoting Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373 , ).
Timothy Guzick, as Personal Representative of the Estate of George J. Nyberg and as Trustee of the George … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Timothy Guzick, as Personal Representative of the Estate of George J. Nyberg and as Trustee of the George … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 381, (stating that the “common-law test of duty is the .
Doe 169 v. Brandon 845 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 2014
Doe 169 v. Brandon 845 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 2014
The risk must be “clear to the person of ordinary prudence.” Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 381-82
Domagala v. Rolland 805 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2011
Domagala v. Rolland 805 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2011
v. Anda, Flom, d at 916 ; Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 381
Bjerke v. Johnson 742 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 2007
Bjerke v. Johnson 742 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 2007
It is not necessary that a defendant have notice of the exact method in which injury will occur “if the possibility of an accident was clear to the person of ordinary prudence.” Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373 , 381—82
Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc. 701 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2005
Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc. 701 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2005
See Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 380 , (stating that an “innkeeper owes a duty to the public to *791 protect it against foreseeable risk of danger attendant upon the maintenance and operation of his property”); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314A(2) (1965) (stating that an innkeeper has a duty to its guests to take reasona
Molloy v. Meier 679 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2004
Molloy v. Meier 679 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2004
“ ‘[T]he risk reasonably to be perceived defines the duty to be obeyed, and risk imports relation; it is risk to another or to others within the range of apprehension.’ ” Connolly v. Ni- *720 collet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 381 , (quoting Palsgraf v. Long Island R. Co., 248 N.Y.
Donaldson v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Duluth 539 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1995
Donaldson v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Duluth 539 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1995
Erickson, d at 170-71 ; see also Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 380 , (concluding that an innkeeper owes a duty to protect persons against foreseeable risk of danger attendant upon the maintenance and operation of its property).
Spitzak v. Hylands, Ltd. 500 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Spitzak v. Hylands, Ltd. 500 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
As stated by Chief Justice Cardozo, ‘The risk reasonably to be perceived defines the duty to be obeyed, and risk imports relation; it is risk to another or to others within the range of apprehension.’ Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 381 , (quoting Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R., 248 N.Y.
Schumacher v. Heig 454 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Schumacher v. Heig 454 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 381
Oswald Ex Rel. Thies v. Law 445 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Oswald Ex Rel. Thies v. Law 445 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 381
Herbst v. Northern States Power Co. 432 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Herbst v. Northern States Power Co. 432 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 382
Van Gordon v. Herzog 410 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Van Gordon v. Herzog 410 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
As stated in Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373 , : [0]ne who assembles a large number of people upon his premises for the purpose of financial gain to himself assumes the responsibility for using all reasonable care to protect others from injury from causes reasonably to be anticipated.
Hoffman v. Wiltscheck 379 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hoffman v. Wiltscheck 379 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hoffman relies on Connolly v. The Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373 , in which the plaintiff, standing on a sidewalk outside the hotel, was injured by an object thrown from an upper floor of the hotel.
Ponticas v. K.M.S. Investments 331 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1983
Ponticas v. K.M.S. Investments 331 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1983
Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373, 381-82 , Albertson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St.
Quinn v. Winkel's, Inc. 279 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1979
Quinn v. Winkel's, Inc. 279 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1979
See Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373
Cracraft v. City of St. Louis Park 279 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1979
Filipczak v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 110 195 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1972
Filipczak v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 110 195 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1972
Connolly v. The Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373 , involved a pedestrian struck by an object thrown from a window of the hotel which was hosting a national convention, and the hotel had notice of similar incidents during the same convention.
Vogt v. Johnson 153 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1967
Vogt v. Johnson 153 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1967
Casimir of Wells, 243 Minn. 289 , 67 N. W. (2d) 644 ; Connolly v. The Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373 , 95 N. W. (2d) 657 , 74 A. L. R. (2d) 1227; Akers v. Chicago, St.
Austin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 152 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1967
Austin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 152 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1967
Casimir of Wells, 243 Minn. 289 , 67 N. W. (2d) 644 ; Connolly v. The Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373 , 95 N. W. (2d) 657 , 74 A. L. R. (2d) 1227; Akers v. Chicago, St.
Hanson v. Christensen 145 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1966

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by