Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bredemann v. Bredemann, 91 N.W.2d 84.

32 citing documents.

Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 449 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1989
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 449 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1989
Only when facts are alleged that amount to fraud on the court as enunciated in Bredemann [v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 2Í, ] may a district court set aside a divorce decree.
Searles v. Searles 412 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Distinguished Searles v. Searles 412 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The dissent finds sufficient facts evidencing laches by relying on Corah v. Corah, 246 Minn. 350 , and Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21
Marriage of Merickel v. Merickel 414 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Merickel v. Merickel 414 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21, 24
Marriage of Blattner v. Blattner 411 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Blattner v. Blattner 411 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See also Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21, 24
Marriage of Yeager v. Yeager 405 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Yeager v. Yeager 405 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21, 24
Marriage of Moir v. Moir 400 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Moir v. Moir 400 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
the supreme court reiterated its holding in Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21 , that dissolution judgments are excluded from the provisions of Minn.R.Civ.P.
Marriage of Clay v. Clay 397 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Clay v. Clay 397 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See also Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21, 24 , (divorce decrees are specifically omitted from the provisions of Rule 60.-02).
Marriage of Adams v. Adams 393 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Adams v. Adams 393 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21, 24-5 , stated the rule that dissolution judgments may be set aside “under such circumstances as amount to a fraud on the court and the administration of justice.
Marriage of Saturnini v. Saturnini 390 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Saturnini v. Saturnini 390 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
A trial court may only set aside a judgment in a dissolution decree “where it determines that such a judgment amounts to fraud upon the court.” see also Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21, 25
Marriage of Nordmark v. Nordmark 388 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nordmark v. Nordmark 388 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21, 24
Marriage of Lindsey v. Lindsey 388 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1986
Marriage of Lindsey v. Lindsey 388 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1986
The court relied upon this court’s decision in Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21, 24 , where we stated: Rule 60.02 of the Rules of Civil Procedure specifies the conditions or situations under which a party may be relieved from a final judgment.
Marriage of Lindsey v. Lindsey 369 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Lindsey v. Lindsey 369 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21
Marriage of Schroetke v. Schroetke 365 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Schroetke v. Schroetke 365 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21, 25
Marriage of Thomas v. Thomas 356 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Thomas v. Thomas 356 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See also, Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21, 25
Berg v. Berg 244 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1976
Berg v. Berg 244 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1976
Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21 , Johnson v. Johnson, 243 Minn. 403
Hedstrom v. Hedstrom 232 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1975
Hedstrom v. Hedstrom 232 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1975
See, Bredemann v. Bredemann, 253 Minn. 21 , Limberg v. Limberg, 10 Wis.