Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp., 85 N.W.2d 207.

23 citing documents.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Respondent, vs. True Gravity Ventures, LLC, et al., Respondents, Astra Genstar ... Minn. 2025
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Respondent, vs. True Gravity Ventures, LLC, et al., Respondents, Astra Genstar ... Minn. 2025
11 In Tombs, we relied on two cases to support our conclusion that neither this court nor the rules of civil procedure could extend the time for appeal:
Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of Mankato 863 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 2015
State v. Sahr 812 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2012
Casper v. ITASCA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES 531 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Casper v. ITASCA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES 531 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
While the law in Minnesota is that a party may not waive a jurisdictional objection, Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm, Corp., 250 Minn. 485, 488 , we are troubled by respondent’s delay in objecting to jurisdiction.
In Re State & Regents Building Asbestos Cases 435 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1989
Bongard v. Bongard 342 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Bongard v. Bongard 342 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp., 250 Minn. 485, 488
State v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 154 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1967
State v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 154 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1967
Bank of Austin, 262 Minn. 231 , 115 N. W. (2d) 235 ; The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp. 250 Minn. 485 , 85 N. W. (2d) 207 .
Arndt v. Minnesota Education Association 134 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1965
Arndt v. Minnesota Education Association 134 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1965
In The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp. 250 Minn. 485 , 85 N. W. (2d) 207, 208 , we said: “Although limitations upon the time for taking an appeal are to be liberally construed to avoid a forfeiture of the right of appeal, neither the supreme court nor the district court can extend the time for appeal by a stay of proceedings or by any order designed to accomplish that p
State v. Sullivan 121 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1963
State v. Sullivan 121 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1963
2 State v. Johnson, 242 Minn. 148 , 64 N. W. (2d) 145 ; The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp. 250 Minn. 485 , 85 N. W. (2d) 207 .
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 857 v. Seem 116 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1962
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 857 v. Seem 116 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1962
1 In The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp. 250 Minn. 485, 488 , 85 N. W. (2d) 207, 209 , we held: “The limitation of time within which an appeal may be taken is jurisdictional under our statutory provisions.
Tryggeseth v. Norcross 115 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1962
Tryggeseth v. Norcross 115 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1962
In The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp. 250 Minn. 485, 488 , 85 N. W. (2d) 207, 209 , we held: “The limitation of time within which an appeal may be taken is jurisdictional under our statutory provisions.
Wurdemann v. Hjelm 102 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1960
Wurdemann v. Hjelm 102 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1960
In The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp. 250 Minn. 485 , 85 N. W. (2d) 207 , this court made absolute a writ of prohibition restraining the municipal court from entertaining any appeal from the justice court judgment.
Tombs v. Ashworth 95 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1959
Tombs v. Ashworth 95 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1959
In The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp. 250 Minn. 485, 488 , 85 N. W. (2d) 207, 209 , we said: “* * * The court may not * * * under the aforesaid rules [i. e., rules of civil procedure] extend the time for taking an appeal.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by